Literature DB >> 15334020

Should we continue performing intrauterine inseminations in the year 2004?

B J Cohlen1.   

Abstract

This review summarizes the existing evidence regarding intrauterine insemination (IUI) as a treatment for cervical hostility, male and unexplained subfertility. IUI in natural cycles has been proven effective in patients with cervical hostility and moderate male subfertility. IUI in cycles with mild ovarian hyperstimulation (MOH) should be the treatment of choice in couples with mild male subfertilty (average total motile sperm count above 10 million) and unexplained subfertilty. When MOH is applied, gonadotropins have been proven more effective compared with clomiphene citrate. Further large trials comparing clomiphene citrate with gonadotropins are mandatory. Prevention of multiple pregnancies in MOH/IUI programs is of paramount importance. A strategy with a low-dose step-up protocol and strict cancellation criteria is proposed. When multiple pregnancies are kept to a minimum, MOH/IUI is more cost-effective compared with in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Future research should focus on prediction models to predict the outcome of MOH/IUI treatment for individual couples before starting treatment. Copyright 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15334020     DOI: 10.1159/000080492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  7 in total

Review 1.  Male factor infertility and ART.

Authors:  Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  The gradient technique improves success rates in intrauterine insemination cycles of unexplained subfertile couples when compared to swim up technique; a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Hatice Karamahmutoglu; Ahmet Erdem; Mehmet Erdem; Mehmet Firat Mutlu; Nuray Bozkurt; Mesut Oktem; Derya Deniz Ercan; Seyhan Gumuslu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility.

Authors:  Alexandra J Bensdorp; Els Slappendel; Carolien Koks; Jur Oosterhuis; Annemieke Hoek; Peter Hompes; Frank Broekmans; Harold Verhoeve; Jan Peter de Bruin; Janne Meije van Weert; Maaike Traas; Jacques Maas; Nicole Beckers; Sjoerd Repping; Ben W Mol; Fulco van der Veen; Madelon van Wely
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Artificial insemination history: hurdles and milestones.

Authors:  W Ombelet; J Van Robays
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2015

5.  Intrauterine Insemination Treatment Strategy for Women over 35 Years Old: Based on a Large Sample Multi-center Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Shuo Yang; Hong-Ying Peng; Ying Li; Li-Ying Zhou; Li Yuan; Yan-Min Ma; Hui-Chun Wang; Rong Li; Ping Liu; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  The Outcome of Assisted Reproductive Techniques among Couples with Male Factors at Prince Khalid Bin Sultan Fertility Centre, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Hytham Bahaeldin Mukhtar; Amani Shaman; Hyder Osman Mirghani; Ayman Adnan Almasalmah
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-06

7.  Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples.

Authors:  Lidija Rakic; Elena Kostova; Ben J Cohlen; Astrid Ep Cantineau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.