Literature DB >> 15333272

A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.

R Webb1, J Richardson, A Pickles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify and estimate the population impact of primary care service delivery factors that independently predict non-attendance for cervical screening.
SETTING: Screening records of all eligible women aged 30 years and over and resident in the former Manchester Health Authority area were analysed (n=72,613).
METHODS: Practice-level and GP-level explanatory variables, along with area-level covariates, were obtained and merged to the study data set. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with having no recorded history of attending NHS cervical screening services. A multivariate model was created to identify independent predictors of non-attendance with comprehensive adjustment for women's age, area-level socio-demographic factors, and other primary care factors. Attributable fraction estimates were used to assess the population impact of the independent predictors.
RESULTS: Large practice size (>4,000 patients), single-handed practice, South Asian male GP, part-time GP employment status, older age and birthplace overseas, and area-level measures of deprivation and transience independently predicted non-attendance. Women born overseas and registered at larger practices were especially unlikely to have ever attended. The combined population attributable fraction estimate for the independent predictors reflecting primary care service delivery was almost 40%, and that for all variables in the final model was over 70%.
CONCLUSIONS: Independent predictors of non-attendance reflecting general practice structure, workload and GP characteristics were identified. Although relative risks were modest, the collective population impact of these factors was considerable, which has implications for the implementation of informed targeting and the development of new screening services by Primary Care Trusts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15333272     DOI: 10.1258/0969141041732166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  10 in total

1.  Predictors of low cervical cancer screening among immigrant women in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Aisha K Lofters; Rahim Moineddin; Stephen W Hwang; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Variation in cervical and breast cancer screening coverage in England: a cross-sectional analysis to characterise districts with atypical behaviour.

Authors:  Nathalie J Massat; Elaine Douglas; Jo Waller; Jane Wardle; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Association between human papillomavirus vaccine status and other cervical cancer risk factors.

Authors:  Harriet L Bowyer; Rachael H Dodd; Laura A V Marlow; Jo Waller
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Colposcopy attendance and deprivation: A retrospective analysis of 27,193 women in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme.

Authors:  E Douglas; J Wardle; N J Massat; J Waller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Factors associated with the achievement of cervical smears by general practitioners.

Authors:  Michaël Rochoy; Thibaut Raginel; Jonathan Favre; Estelle Soueres; Nassir Messaadi; Valérie Deken; Alain Duhamel; Christophe Berkhout
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-12-08

6.  Barriers to cervical cancer screening faced by immigrants: a registry-based study of 1.4 million women in Norway.

Authors:  Maarit K Leinonen; Suzanne Campbell; Giske Ursin; Ameli Tropé; Mari Nygård
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  Public awareness that HPV is a risk factor for cervical cancer.

Authors:  L A V Marlow; J Waller; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Determinants in the Uptake of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: A Systematic Review Based on European Studies.

Authors:  Victoria Fernández de Casadevante; Julita Gil Cuesta; Lourdes Cantarero-Arévalo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Enhanced invitation methods to increase uptake of NHS health checks: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alice S Forster; Caroline Burgess; Lisa McDermott; Alison J Wright; Hiten Dodhia; Mark Conner; Jane Miller; Caroline Rudisill; Victoria Cornelius; Martin C Gulliford
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Disparities in cervical cancer screening participation in Iran: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2016 nationwide STEPS survey.

Authors:  Rozhin Amin; Ali-Asghar Kolahi; Nader Jahanmehr; Ali-Reza Abadi; Mohammad-Reza Sohrabi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.295

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.