Literature DB >> 15332070

Variation in communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department.

Rosemary Spencer1, Enrico Coiera, Pamela Logan.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We determine whether there are differences in role-related communication patterns in the emergency department (ED).
METHODS: This was an observational study of a metropolitan ED. Four medical officers and 4 nurses were observed for 19 hours and 52 minutes. Communication load was measured by proportion of observed time in communication, proportion of concurrent communication events, and proportion of interruptions.
RESULTS: Eight hundred thirty-one communication events were identified, an average of 42 events per person per hour. Eighty-nine percent of clinicians' time was spent in communication. Synchronous communication channels, involving face-to-face or telephone conversations, were used in 84% of events. One third of communication events were classified as interruptions, averaging 15 interruptions per person per hour. Senior medical and nursing staff experienced higher rates of interruption than junior medical staff and registered nurses with an allocated patient load.
CONCLUSION: There was considerable variation in communication loads on clinical staff occupying different roles in the ED. Medical registrars had a high proportion of interruptions and spent the most time dealing with interruptions. These new data suggest some clinical roles may be at higher risk of communication overload than those of the general clinical population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15332070     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  23 in total

1.  Fostering Interdisciplinary Communication between Pharmacy and Nursing Students.

Authors:  Aleda M H Chen; Mary E Kiersma; Carrie N Keib; Stephanie Cailor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Supporting patient care in the emergency department with a computerized whiteboard system.

Authors:  Dominik Aronsky; Ian Jones; Kevin Lanaghan; Corey M Slovis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Understanding and Visualizing Multitasking and Task Switching Activities: A Time Motion Study to Capture Nursing Workflow.

Authors:  Po-Yin Yen; Marjorie Kelley; Marcelo Lopetegui; Amber L Rosado; Elaina M Migliore; Esther M Chipps; Jacalyn Buck
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

Review 4.  A systematic review of the psychological literature on interruption and its patient safety implications.

Authors:  Simon Y W Li; Farah Magrabi; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Factors influencing physician responsiveness to nurse-initiated communication: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Milisa Manojlovich; Molly Harrod; Timothy Hofer; Megan Lafferty; Michaella McBratnie; Sarah L Krein
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  Communication systems in healthcare.

Authors:  Enrico Coiera
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2006-05

7.  The roles of MDs and RNs as initiators and recipients of interruptions in workflow.

Authors:  Juliana J Brixey; David J Robinson; James P Turley; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Using the computer in the clinical consultation; setting the stage, reviewing, recording, and taking actions: multi-channel video study.

Authors:  Pushpa Kumarapeli; Simon de Lusignan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Evaluation of an asynchronous physician voicemail sign-out for emergency department admissions.

Authors:  Leora I Horwitz; Vivek Parwani; Nidhi R Shah; Jeremiah D Schuur; Thom Meredith; Grace Y Jenq; Raghavendra G Kulkarni
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 10.  Clinical information systems in the intensive care unit: primum non nocere.

Authors:  Stephen E Lapinsky
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.