Literature DB >> 33168635

Factors influencing physician responsiveness to nurse-initiated communication: a qualitative study.

Milisa Manojlovich1, Molly Harrod2, Timothy Hofer2,3, Megan Lafferty4, Michaella McBratnie4, Sarah L Krein2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: How quickly physicians respond to communications from bedside nurses is important for the delivery of safe inpatient care. Delays in physician responsiveness can impede care or contribute to patient harm. Understanding contributory factors to physician responsiveness can provide insights to promote timely physician response, possibly improving communication to ensure safe patient care. The purpose of this study was to describe the factors contributing to physician responsiveness to text or numeric pages, telephone calls and face-to-face messages delivered by nurses on adult general care units.
METHODS: Using a qualitative design, we collected data through observation, shadowing, interviews and focus groups of bedside registered nurses and physicians who worked in four hospitals in the Midwest USA. We analysed the data using inductive content analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 155 physicians and nurses participated. Eighty-six nurses and 32 physicians participated in focus groups or individual interviews; we shadowed 37 physicians and nurses across all sites. Two major inter-related themes emerged, message and non-message related factors. Message-related factors included the medium nurses used to convey messages, physician preference for notification via one communication medium over another and the clarity of the message, all of which could cause confusion and thus a delayed response. Non-message related factors included trust and interpersonal relationships, and different perspectives between nurses and physicians on the same clinical issue that affected perceptions of urgency, and contributed to delays in responsiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: Physician responsiveness to communications from bedside nurses depends on a complex combination of factors related to the message itself and non-message related factors. How quickly physicians respond is a multifactorial phenomenon, and strategies to promote a timely response within the context of a given situation must be directed to both groups. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; health services research; hospital medicine; information technology; patient safety

Year:  2020        PMID: 33168635      PMCID: PMC8140397          DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  42 in total

1.  Alphanumeric paging: a potential source of problems in patient care and communication.

Authors:  Sasa Espino; Diane Cox; Brian Kaplan
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 2.  Do safety checklists improve teamwork and communication in the operating room? A systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Russ; Shantanu Rout; Nick Sevdalis; Krishna Moorthy; Ara Darzi; Charles Vincent
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Understanding interprofessional communication: a content analysis of email communications between doctors and nurses.

Authors:  C N C Smith; S D Quan; D Morra; P G Rossos; H Khatibi; V Lo; H Wong; R C Wu
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Team communications in surgery - creating a culture of safety.

Authors:  Brigid M Gillespie; Karleen Gwinner; Wendy Chaboyer; Nicole Fairweather
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.338

5.  The Quality in Australian Health Care Study.

Authors:  R M Wilson; W B Runciman; R W Gibberd; B T Harrison; L Newby; J D Hamilton
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1995-11-06       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 6.  Packaging: a grounded theory of how to report physiological deterioration effectively.

Authors:  Tom Andrews; Heather Waterman
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Impact of localizing physicians to hospital units on nurse-physician communication and agreement on the plan of care.

Authors:  Kevin J O'Leary; Diane B Wayne; Matthew P Landler; Nita Kulkarni; Corinne Haviley; Katherine J Hahn; Jiyeon Jeon; Katherine M Englert; Mark V Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Patient characteristics, interventions and outcomes of 1151 rapid response team activations in a tertiary hospital: a prospective study.

Authors:  K White; I A Scott; A Bernard; K McCulloch; A Vaux; C Joyce; C M Sullivan
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.048

Review 9.  Ward rounds, participants, roles and perceptions: literature review.

Authors:  Victoria Walton; Anne Hogden; Julie Johnson; David Greenfield
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2016-05-09

10.  The Effect of Health Information Technology on Health Care Provider Communication: A Mixed-Method Protocol.

Authors:  Milisa Manojlovich; Julia Adler-Milstein; Molly Harrod; Anne Sales; Timothy P Hofer; Sanjay Saint; Sarah L Krein
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-06-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Qualitative Analysis of Team Communication with a Clinical Texting System at a Midwestern Academic Hospital.

Authors:  Joy L Lee; Areeba Kara; Monica Huffman; Marianne S Matthias; Bethany Radecki; April Savoy; Jason T Schaffer; Michael Weiner
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Healthcare professionals' perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in the emergency department: a critical incident study.

Authors:  Jenny Milton; Annette Erichsen Andersson; N David Åberg; Brigid M Gillespie; Lena Oxelmark
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.803

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.