Literature DB >> 15330778

Summary of human responses to ventilation.

O A Seppänen1, W J Fisk.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: It is known that ventilation is necessary to remove indoor-generated pollutants from indoor air or dilute their concentration to acceptable levels. But as the limit values of all pollutants are not known the exact determination of required ventilation rates based on pollutant concentrations is seldom possible. The selection of ventilation rates has to be based also on epidemiological research, laboratory and field experiments and experience. The existing literature indicates that ventilation has a significant impact on several important human outcomes including: (1) communicable respiratory illnesses; (2) sick building syndrome symptoms; (3) task performance and productivity, and (4) perceived air quality (PAQ) among occupants or sensory panels (5) respiratory allergies and asthma. In many studies, prevalence of sick building syndrome symptoms has also been associated with characteristics of HVAC-systems. Often the prevalence of SBS symptoms is higher in air-conditioned buildings than in naturally ventilated buildings. The evidence suggests that better hygiene, commissioning, operation and maintenance of air handling systems may be particularly important for reducing the negative effects of HVAC systems. Ventilation may also have harmful effects on indoor air quality and climate if not properly designed, installed, maintained and operated. Ventilation may bring indoors harmful substances or deteriorate indoor environment. Ventilation interacts also with the building envelope and may deteriorate the structures of the building. Ventilation changes the pressure differences across the structures of building and may cause or prevent infiltration of pollutants from structures or adjacent spaces. Ventilation is also in many cases used to control the thermal environment or humidity in buildings. The paper summarises the current knowledge on positive and negative effects of ventilation on health and other human responses. The focus is on office-type working environment and residential buildings. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The review shows that ventilation has various positive impacts on health and productivity of building occupants. Ventilation reduces the prevalence of airborne infectious diseases and thus the number of sick leave days. In office environment a ventilation rate up to 20-25 L/s per person seem to decrease the prevalence of SBS-symptoms. Air conditioning systems may increase the prevalence of SBS-symptoms relative to natural ventilation if not clean. In residential buildings the air change rate in cold climates should not be below app. 0.5 ach. Ventilation systems may cause pressure differences over the building envelope and bring harmful pollutants indoors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15330778     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00279.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  20 in total

1.  A new multiple regression model to identify multi-family houses with a high prevalence of sick building symptoms "SBS", within the healthy sustainable house study in Stockholm (3H).

Authors:  Karin Engvall; M Hult; R Corner; E Lampa; D Norbäck; G Emenius
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-07-26       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Ventilation control for airborne transmission of human exhaled bio-aerosols in buildings.

Authors:  Hua Qian; Xiaohong Zheng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Sick building syndrome in relation to air exchange rate, CO(2), room temperature and relative air humidity in university computer classrooms: an experimental study.

Authors:  Dan Norbäck; Klas Nordström
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Reducing burden of disease from residential indoor air exposures in Europe (HEALTHVENT project).

Authors:  Arja Asikainen; Paolo Carrer; Stylianos Kephalopoulos; Eduardo de Oliveira Fernandes; Pawel Wargocki; Otto Hänninen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 5.  Integrated Management of Residential Indoor Air Quality: A Call for Stakeholders in a Changing Climate.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Levasseur; Patrick Poulin; Céline Campagna; Jean-Marc Leclerc
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  SBS symptoms in relation to dampness and ventilation in inspected single-family houses in Sweden.

Authors:  Greta Smedje; Juan Wang; Dan Norbäck; Håkan Nilsson; Karin Engvall
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  School environment as predictor of teacher sick leave: data-linked prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jenni Ervasti; Mika Kivimäki; Ichiro Kawachi; S V Subramanian; Jaana Pentti; Tuula Oksanen; Riikka Puusniekka; Tiina Pohjonen; Jussi Vahtera; Marianna Virtanen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  A ventilation intervention study in classrooms to improve indoor air quality: the FRESH study.

Authors:  Jeannette T M Rosbach; Machiel Vonk; Frans Duijm; Jan T van Ginkel; Ulrike Gehring; Bert Brunekreef
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Modeling Associations between Principals' Reported Indoor Environmental Quality and Students' Self-Reported Respiratory Health Outcomes Using GLMM and ZIP Models.

Authors:  Oluyemi Toyinbo; Markus Matilainen; Mari Turunen; Tuula Putus; Richard Shaughnessy; Ulla Haverinen-Shaughnessy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Ventilation Positive Pressure Intervention Effect on Indoor Air Quality in a School Building with Moisture Problems.

Authors:  Camilla Vornanen-Winqvist; Kati Järvi; Sander Toomla; Kaiser Ahmed; Maria A Andersson; Raimo Mikkola; Tamás Marik; László Kredics; Heidi Salonen; Jarek Kurnitski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.