Literature DB >> 15330714

Electrophysiological evidence for independent speed channels in human motion processing.

Sven P Heinrich1, Maarten J van der Smagt, Michael Bach, Michael B Hoffmann.   

Abstract

A variety of psychophysical studies suggests that motion perception in humans is mediated by at least two speed-tuned channels. To study the neurophysiological underpinnings of these channels in the human visual cortex, we recorded visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to motion onset. We applied an adaptation paradigm that allowed us (a) to isolate and extract direction-specific cortical responses and (b) to assess cross-adaptation in the speed domain. VEPs resulting from the onset of left- or rightward motion at either low or high speeds were recorded from three occipital recording sites in 11 subjects. For each of these test stimuli, responses were collected after adaptation to one of five different conditions: a static adaptation pattern (baseline), adaptation to low-speed motion (3.5 degrees/s) either in the same or in the opposite direction as the test, or adaptation to high-speed motion (32 degrees/s) either in the same or in the opposite direction as the test. We report considerable direction-specific adaptation for same adaptation and test speeds (by 28-37% of baseline response; p <.002), whereas there was no direction-specific adaptation across speeds. We supplement these electrophysiological data with corresponding psychophysical results. The lack of direction-specific cross-adaptation in the speed domain demonstrated with physiological and psychophysical techniques supports models of at least two speed-tuned channels in the human motion system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15330714     DOI: 10.1167/4.6.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Motion-onset auditory-evoked potentials critically depend on history.

Authors:  Ramona Grzeschik; Martin Böckmann-Barthel; Roland Mühler; Michael B Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motion adaptation: net duration matters, not continuousness.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Anja M Schilling; Michael Bach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Practice-related improvement in working memory is modulated by changes in processing external interference.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Aaron M Rutman; Wesley C Clapp; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The influence of perceptual training on working memory in older adults.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Wesley C Clapp; Joseph L Hardy; Peter B Delahunt; Henry W Mahncke; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Interaction effects of visual stimulus speed and contrast on postural sway.

Authors:  Vivian Holten; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten; Stella F Donker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Direct evidence for encoding of motion streaks in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Deborah Apthorp; D Samuel Schwarzkopf; Christian Kaul; Bahador Bahrami; David Alais; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Motion perception: a review of developmental changes and the role of early visual experience.

Authors:  Batsheva Hadad; Sivan Schwartz; Daphne Maurer; Terri L Lewis
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.