Literature DB >> 15330712

Saccadic localization in the presence of cues to three-dimensional shape.

Dhanraj Vishwanath1, Eileen Kowler.   

Abstract

Saccades directed to simple two-dimensional (2D) target shapes under instructions to look at the target as a whole land near the center of gravity (COG) of the shape with a high degree of precision (He & Kowler, 1991; Kowler & Blaser, 1995; McGowan, Kowler, Sharma, & Chubb, 1998; Melcher & Kowler, 1999; Vishwanath, Kowler, & Feldman, 2000). This pattern of performance has been attributed to the averaging of visual signals across the shape. Natural objects, however, are three-dimensional (3D), and the shape of the object can differ dramatically from its 2D retinal projection. This study examined saccadic localization of computer-generated perspective images of 3D shapes. Targets were made to appear either 2D or 3D by manipulating shading, context, and contour cues. Average saccadic landing positions (SD approximately 10% eccentricity) fell at either the 2D or 3D COG, and occasionally in between, depending on the nature of the 3D cues and the subject. The results show that saccades directed to objects are not compelled to land at the 2D COG, but can be sensitive to other visual cues, such as cues to 3D structure. One way to account for these results, without abandoning the averaging mechanism that has accounted well for performance with simple 2D shapes, is for saccadic landing position to be computed based on averaging across a weighted representation of the shape in which portions projected to be located at a greater distance receive more weight.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15330712     DOI: 10.1167/4.6.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  16 in total

1.  Anticipatory gaze strategies when grasping moving objects.

Authors:  Melissa C Bulloch; Steven L Prime; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The relationship between spatial pooling and attention in saccadic and perceptual tasks.

Authors:  Elias H Cohen; Brian S Schnitzer; Timothy M Gersch; Manish Singh; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  "Graspability" of objects affects gaze patterns during perception and action tasks.

Authors:  Loni Desanghere; J J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Perception of physical stability and center of mass of 3-D objects.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Roland W Fleming; Manish Singh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Eye movements while viewing narrated, captioned, and silent videos.

Authors:  Nicholas M Ross; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Eye movements and attention: the role of pre-saccadic shifts of attention in perception, memory and the control of saccades.

Authors:  Min Zhao; Timothy M Gersch; Brian S Schnitzer; Barbara A Dosher; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Contextual processing of brightness and color in Mongolian gerbils.

Authors:  Christian Garbers; Josephine Henke; Christian Leibold; Thomas Wachtler; Kay Thurley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Visual working memory modulates within-object metrics of saccade landing position.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Fitts's Law and speed/accuracy trade-offs during sequences of saccades: Implications for strategies of saccadic planning.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Oh-Sang Kwon; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.