CONTEXT: Both antidepressant medication and structured psychotherapy have been proven efficacious, but less than one third of people with depressive disorders receive effective levels of either treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare usual primary care for depression with 2 intervention programs: telephone care management and telephone care management plus telephone psychotherapy. DESIGN: Three-group randomized controlled trial with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment conducted between November 2000 and May 2002. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 600 patients beginning antidepressant treatment for depression were systematically sampled from 7 group-model primary care clinics; patients already receiving psychotherapy were excluded. INTERVENTIONS:Usual primary care; usual care plus a telephone care management program including at least 3 outreach calls, feedback to the treating physician, and care coordination; usual care plus care management integrated with a structured 8-session cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy program delivered by telephone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blinded telephone interviews at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months assessed depression severity (Hopkins Symptom Checklist Depression Scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire), patient-rated improvement, and satisfaction with treatment. Computerized administrative data examined use of antidepressant medication and outpatient visits. RESULTS: Treatment participation rates were 97% for telephone care management and 93% for telephone care management plus psychotherapy. Compared with usual care, the telephone psychotherapy intervention led to lower mean Hopkins Symptom Checklist Depression Scale depression scores (P =.02), a higher proportion of patients reporting that depression was "much improved" (80% vs 55%, P<.001), and a higher proportion of patients "very satisfied" with depression treatment (59% vs 29%, P<.001). The telephone care management program had smaller effects on patient-rated improvement (66% vs 55%, P =.04) and satisfaction (47% vs 29%, P =.001); effects on mean depression scores were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: For primary care patients beginning antidepressant treatment, a telephone program integrating care management and structured cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy can significantly improve satisfaction and clinical outcomes. These findings suggest a new public health model of psychotherapy for depression including active outreach and vigorous efforts to improve access to and motivation for treatment.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Both antidepressant medication and structured psychotherapy have been proven efficacious, but less than one third of people with depressive disorders receive effective levels of either treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare usual primary care for depression with 2 intervention programs: telephone care management and telephone care management plus telephone psychotherapy. DESIGN: Three-group randomized controlled trial with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment conducted between November 2000 and May 2002. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 600 patients beginning antidepressant treatment for depression were systematically sampled from 7 group-model primary care clinics; patients already receiving psychotherapy were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Usual primary care; usual care plus a telephone care management program including at least 3 outreach calls, feedback to the treating physician, and care coordination; usual care plus care management integrated with a structured 8-session cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy program delivered by telephone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blinded telephone interviews at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months assessed depression severity (Hopkins Symptom Checklist Depression Scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire), patient-rated improvement, and satisfaction with treatment. Computerized administrative data examined use of antidepressant medication and outpatient visits. RESULTS: Treatment participation rates were 97% for telephone care management and 93% for telephone care management plus psychotherapy. Compared with usual care, the telephone psychotherapy intervention led to lower mean Hopkins Symptom Checklist Depression Scale depression scores (P =.02), a higher proportion of patients reporting that depression was "much improved" (80% vs 55%, P<.001), and a higher proportion of patients "very satisfied" with depression treatment (59% vs 29%, P<.001). The telephone care management program had smaller effects on patient-rated improvement (66% vs 55%, P =.04) and satisfaction (47% vs 29%, P =.001); effects on mean depression scores were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: For primary care patients beginning antidepressant treatment, a telephone program integrating care management and structured cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy can significantly improve satisfaction and clinical outcomes. These findings suggest a new public health model of psychotherapy for depression including active outreach and vigorous efforts to improve access to and motivation for treatment.
Authors: Michelle J Pearce; Harold G Koenig; Clive J Robins; Bruce Nelson; Sally F Shaw; Harvey J Cohen; Michael B King Journal: Psychotherapy (Chic) Date: 2014-11-03
Authors: William Whang; Matthew M Burg; Robert M Carney; Kenneth E Freedland; J Thomas Bigger; Diane Catellier; Susan Czajkowski; Nancy Frasure-Smith; Donald C Haas; Allan S Jaffe; Francois Lespérance; Vivian Medina; Joan Duer-Hefele; Gabrielle A Osorio; Faith Parsons; Peter A Shapiro; David S Sheps; Viola Vaccarino; Karina W Davidson Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-05-25 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; Herbert C Schulberg; Edward P Post; Bruce L Rollman; Bea Herbeck Belnap; Harold Alan Pincus Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Philip S Wang; Michael J Gruber; Richard E Powers; Michael Schoenbaum; Anthony H Speier; Kenneth B Wells; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-12-17 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Stéphanie Wahab; Jammie Trimble; Angie Mejia; S Renee Mitchell; Mary Jo Thomas; Vanessa Timmons; A Star Waters; Dora Raymaker; Christina Nicolaidis Journal: J Evid Based Soc Work Date: 2014
Authors: Charles H Bombardier; Jesse R Fann; Evette J Ludman; Steven D Vannoy; Joshua R Dyer; Jason K Barber; Nancy R Temkin Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2017 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Peter P Roy-Byrne; Michelle G Craske; Murray B Stein; Greer Sullivan; Alexander Bystritsky; Wayne Katon; Daniela Golinelli; Cathy D Sherbourne Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-03