AIMS: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of indometacin in preterm infants with symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus and to investigate the influence of various factors on the response to treatment. METHODS: Data were collected from 35 infants (gestational age 25-34 weeks; postnatal age 1-77 days) in neonatal units in Belfast and Copenhagen. Infants received an initial course of up to three doses of intravenous indometacin (0.1-0.2 mg kg(-1)) as considered appropriate by the treating physician. For those infants who did not respond to therapy or in whom the ductus reopened, a second course was sometimes given. Population analysis of the 185 plasma concentrations obtained was conducted using NONMEM and pharmacokinetic and demographic differences between responders and nonresponders were compared. RESULTS: The concentration-time course of indometacin was best described by a one-compartment model. The final population parameter estimates of clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) (standardized to the median weight of 1.17 kg) were 0.00711 l h(-1) and 0.266 l, respectively. CL increased from birth by approximately 3.38% per day and V by approximately 1.47% per day. Concomitant digoxin therapy resulted in a 30% decrease in V. Interindividual variability in CL and V was 41% and 21%, respectively. Interoccasion variability for CL was 43%. Residual variability corresponded to a standard deviation of 0.148 mg l(-1). Closure occurred in 75% of infants with a plasma concentration > or = 0.4 mg l(-1) 24 h after the last dose. CONCLUSIONS: Dosing regimens for indometacin should take into account the weight and postnatal age of the infant and any concomitant digoxin therapy. The population estimates can be used to determine typical values of CL and V allowing the prediction of individualized doses of indometacin that should increase the probability of achieving a 24 h plasma concentration > or = 0.4 mg l(-1). Although the pharmacokinetic estimates will be affected by both interindividual and within-individual variation, it is anticipated that this approach will decrease the variability of exposure and optimize treatment outcome.
AIMS: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of indometacin in preterm infants with symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus and to investigate the influence of various factors on the response to treatment. METHODS: Data were collected from 35 infants (gestational age 25-34 weeks; postnatal age 1-77 days) in neonatal units in Belfast and Copenhagen. Infants received an initial course of up to three doses of intravenous indometacin (0.1-0.2 mg kg(-1)) as considered appropriate by the treating physician. For those infants who did not respond to therapy or in whom the ductus reopened, a second course was sometimes given. Population analysis of the 185 plasma concentrations obtained was conducted using NONMEM and pharmacokinetic and demographic differences between responders and nonresponders were compared. RESULTS: The concentration-time course of indometacin was best described by a one-compartment model. The final population parameter estimates of clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) (standardized to the median weight of 1.17 kg) were 0.00711 l h(-1) and 0.266 l, respectively. CL increased from birth by approximately 3.38% per day and V by approximately 1.47% per day. Concomitant digoxin therapy resulted in a 30% decrease in V. Interindividual variability in CL and V was 41% and 21%, respectively. Interoccasion variability for CL was 43%. Residual variability corresponded to a standard deviation of 0.148 mg l(-1). Closure occurred in 75% of infants with a plasma concentration > or = 0.4 mg l(-1) 24 h after the last dose. CONCLUSIONS: Dosing regimens for indometacin should take into account the weight and postnatal age of the infant and any concomitant digoxin therapy. The population estimates can be used to determine typical values of CL and V allowing the prediction of individualized doses of indometacin that should increase the probability of achieving a 24 h plasma concentration > or = 0.4 mg l(-1). Although the pharmacokinetic estimates will be affected by both interindividual and within-individual variation, it is anticipated that this approach will decrease the variability of exposure and optimize treatment outcome.
Authors: B S Alpert; M J Lewins; D W Rowland; M J Grant; P M Olley; S J Soldin; P R Swyer; F Coceani; R D Rowe Journal: J Pediatr Date: 1979-10 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Tamorah R Lewis; Elaine L Shelton; Sara L Van Driest; Prince J Kannankeril; Jeff Reese Journal: Semin Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2018-02-24 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Julie Autmizguine; Chiara Melloni; Christoph P Hornik; Samantha Dallefeld; Barrie Harper; Ram Yogev; Janice E Sullivan; Andrew M Atz; Amira Al-Uzri; Susan Mendley; Brenda Poindexter; Jeff Mitchell; Andrew Lewandowski; Paula Delmore; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Daniel Gonzalez Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Carl H Backes; Kevin D Hill; Elaine L Shelton; Jonathan L Slaughter; Tamorah R Lewis; Dany E Weisz; May Ling Mah; Shazia Bhombal; Charles V Smith; Patrick J McNamara; William E Benitz; Vidu Garg Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-09-03 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Ana C Puhl; Flora A Milton; Aleksandra Cvoro; Douglas H Sieglaff; Jéssica C L Campos; Amanda Bernardes; Carly S Filgueira; Jan Lammel Lindemann; Tuo Deng; Francisco A R Neves; Igor Polikarpov; Paul Webb Journal: Nucl Recept Signal Date: 2015-10-05