Literature DB >> 15327014

Proposal for guidelines to establish common biological reference intervals in large geographical areas for biochemical quantities measured frequently in serum and plasma.

Pål Rustad1, Peter Felding, Ari Lahti.   

Abstract

A suggestion for a standard procedure to establish biological reference intervals for biochemical quantities by a multicenter approach is presented. This procedure was developed for and used in the Nordic Reference Interval Project 2000 (NORIP). This project established biological reference intervals for 25 frequently requested biochemical quantities through cooperation of 102 Nordic laboratories. Each laboratory performed collection of reference samples and measurement using their routine methods. The bias of each routine method was eliminated by use of common reference materials measured in each of the participating laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15327014     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Cutoffs for Nutritional Biomarkers.

Authors:  Ramkripa Raghavan; Fayrouz Sakr Ashour; Regan Bailey
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Prerequisites for use of common reference intervals.

Authors:  Ferruccio Ceriotti
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2007-08

3.  Whether western normative laboratory values used for clinical diagnosis are applicable to Indian population? An overview on reference interval.

Authors:  T Malati
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2009-07-09

Review 4.  Bone Turnover Markers in Children: From Laboratory Challenges to Clinical Interpretation.

Authors:  Aurélie Ladang; Frank Rauch; Edgard Delvin; Etienne Cavalier
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Reference values of thirty-one frequently used laboratory markers for 75-year-old males and females.

Authors:  Ingvar Ryden; Lars Lind; Anders Larsson
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.384

Review 6.  Biological variation: Understanding why it is so important?

Authors:  Tony Badrick
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2021-01-04

7.  Development and validation of reassigned CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE-based models for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction.

Authors:  Jingmin Yuan; Yan Sun; Ke Wang; Zhiyi Wang; Duo Li; Meng Fan; Xiang Bu; Jun Chen; Zhiquan Wu; Hui Geng; Jiamei Wu; Ying Xu; Mingwei Chen; Hui Ren
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Lipoprotein subfractions by nuclear magnetic resonance are associated with tumor characteristics in breast cancer.

Authors:  Vidar G Flote; Riyas Vettukattil; Tone F Bathen; Thore Egeland; Anne McTiernan; Hanne Frydenberg; Anders Husøy; Sissi E Finstad; Jon Lømo; Øystein Garred; Ellen Schlichting; Erik A Wist; Inger Thune
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Pediatric Reference Intervals for Biochemical Markers: Gaps and Challenges, Recent National Initiatives and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Houman Tahmasebi; Victoria Higgins; Angela W S Fung; Dorothy Truong; Nicole M A White-Al Habeeb; Khosrow Adeli
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2017-03-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.