Literature DB >> 15325417

Determining the role of phonology in silent reading using event-related brain potentials.

Randy Lynn Newman1, John F Connolly.   

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to delineate phonology's role in silent reading using event-related brain potential (ERP) techniques. Terminal endings of high cloze sentences were manipulated in four conditions in which the terminal word was: (1) the high cloze ending and thus orthographically, phonologically and semantically congruent (e.g., The gambler had a streak of bad luck.); (2) a pseudohomophone that was orthographically incongruent, but was phonologically congruent to the anticipated ending (e.g., The ship disappeared into the thick phog [fog].); (3) a word that was orthographically, phonologically and semantically incongruent to expectations (e.g., The dog chased the cat up the Queen [tree].); or (4) a nonword and consequently orthographically, phonologically and semantically incongruent to expectations (e.g., The gas station is about two miles down the bole [road].). A N270 was elicited by orthographically incongruent words and nonwords (conditions 2, 3 and 4), likely reflecting violations of orthographic form expectations, while the presence of the N400 to semantically incongruent words and nonwords (conditions 3 and 4) reflected violations of semantic expectations. The relative absence of the N400 response to pseudohomophones (condition 3) indicates that integrating word meaning with sentential context is influenced by the phonological representation of the presented letter string. The implication of these results for theories of word recognition is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15325417     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  24 in total

1.  Number representation is influenced by numerical processing level: an ERP study.

Authors:  Junying Liang; Jun Yin; Tong Chen; Hui Chen; Xiaowei Ding; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Electrophysiological evidence of sublexical phonological access in character processing by L2 Chinese learners of L1 alphabetic scripts.

Authors:  Yen Na Yum; Sam-Po Law; Kwan Nok Mo; Dustin Lau; I-Fan Su; Mark S K Shum
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Phonological coding during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Morten H Christiansen; Padraic Monaghan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Recognition of affective prosody in brain-damaged patients and healthy controls: a neurophysiological study using EEG and whole-head MEG.

Authors:  Boris Kotchoubey; Jochen Kaiser; Vladimir Bostanov; Werner Lutzenberger; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Pseudohomophone effects provide evidence of early lexico-phonological processing in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Mario Braun; Florian Hutzler; Johannes C Ziegler; Michael Dambacher; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Phonology is fundamental in skilled reading: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Jane Ashby
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

8.  Skilled readers begin processing sub-phonemic features by 80 ms during visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Lisa D Sanders; John Kingston
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  An ERP study on whether the P600 can reflect the presence of unexpected phonology.

Authors:  Baolin Liu; Zhixing Jin; Zhongning Wang; Shuai Xin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Exploring the temporal boundary conditions of the articulatory in-out preference effect.

Authors:  Judith Gerten; Sascha Topolinski
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.