Literature DB >> 15324977

Challenges for designing and implementing decision aids.

Deb Feldman-Stewart1, Michael D Brundage.   

Abstract

Decision aids are tools intended to help patients with decisions about their health-care. We have developed three decision aids to help patients with treatment decisions for: locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), advanced non-small cell lung cancer (A-NSCLC), and early-stage prostate cancer (ES-PC). In developing the aids, we carried out studies to provide them with an empirical basis, and to evaluate their potential for impact. In this paper we report results that challenge common assumptions and typical practice that currently occurs in the development of decision aids. The challenges relate to: how the content of the aid is defined, how the information is presented, how to incorporate decision aids into the dynamic, complex process of making such decisions, and how to evaluate the aids. We conclude that critical appraisal of issues related to the design and implementation of decision aids is required. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15324977     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  21 in total

1.  The use of multi-criteria decision analysis weight elicitation techniques in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study.

Authors:  Janine A van Til; James G Dolan; Anne M Stiggelbout; Karin C G M Groothuis; Maarten J Ijzerman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Integrating Decision Making and Mental Health Interventions Research: Research Directions.

Authors:  Celia E Wills; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2006

3.  Why values elicitation techniques enable people to make informed decisions about cancer trial participation.

Authors:  Purva Abhyankar; Hilary L Bekker; Barbara A Summers; Galina Velikova
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Adopting patient-centred tools in cancer care: role of evidence and other factors.

Authors:  A Glenn; R Urquhart
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  An information-centric framework for designing patient-centered medical decision aids and risk communication.

Authors:  Lyndsey Franklin; Catherine Plaisant; Ben Shneiderman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

6.  Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness (CEDAR): study protocol.

Authors:  Bernd Puschner; Sabine Steffen; Mike Slade; Helena Kaliniecka; Mario Maj; Andrea Fiorillo; Povl Munk-Jørgensen; Jens Ivar Larsen; Anikó Egerházi; Zoltan Nemes; Wulf Rössler; Wolfram Kawohl; Thomas Becker
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Assessment of preferences for treatment: validation of a measure.

Authors:  Souraya Sidani; Dana R Epstein; Richard R Bootzin; Patricia Moritz; Joyal Miranda
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Decision-making about mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: development and piloting of two computer-based decision aids.

Authors:  Clare L Emmett; Deirdre J Murphy; Roshni R Patel; Tom Fahey; Claire Jones; Ian W Ricketts; Peter Gregor; Maureen Macleod; Alan A Montgomery
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  MATRIX - development and feasibility of a guide for quality assessment of patient decision aids.

Authors:  Matthias Lenz; Jürgen Kasper
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2007-08-29

Review 10.  Counseling patients about sexual health when considering post-prostatectomy radiation treatment.

Authors:  D Wittmann; J E Montie; D A Hamstra; H Sandler; D P Wood
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.