Literature DB >> 15324290

Effects of speech and print feedback on spelling by children with autism.

Ralf W Schlosser1, Doreen M Blischak.   

Abstract

In this systematic replication of a previous study (R. W. Schlosser, D. M. Blischak, P. J. Belfiore, C. Bartley, and N. Barnett, 1998), the effects of speech and print feedback on spelling performance were evaluated. Four children with autism and no functional speech were taught to spell words with a speech-generating device under 3 feedback conditions. In the auditory-visual condition, children received both speech and print feedback, whereas in the auditory and visual conditions, only 1 type of feedback was provided. An adapted alternating treatments design was used. All 4 children reached criterion across conditions. Although 3 children reached criterion first with print or speech-print feedback, 1 child was most efficient with speech-print followed by speech feedback. Based on the findings of both studies, 2 distinct profiles of feedback efficiency are proposed. Children that exemplify the primarily visual profile spell words most efficiently when feedback involves print. Children that fit the auditory profile spell words most efficiently when feedback involves speech. The implications for understanding the learning characteristics of children with autism, as well as those for practice and further research are derived.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15324290     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/063)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  6 in total

Review 1.  A review of technology-based interventions to teach academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Victoria Knight; Bethany R McKissick; Alicia Saunders
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-11

2.  A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Jennifer B Ganz; Theresa L Earles-Vollrath; Amy K Heath; Richard I Parker; Mandy J Rispoli; Jaime B Duran
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-01

Review 3.  The potential influence of stimulus overselectivity in AAC: information from eye tracking and behavioral studies of attention with individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  William V Dube; Krista M Wilkinson
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Impact of Computerized "Sounding out" on Spelling Performance of a Child Who Uses AAC: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Jillian H McCarthy; David R Beukelman; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  Perspect Augment altern commun       Date:  2011-12

5.  Influence of computerized sounding out on spelling performance for children who do and do not rely on AAC.

Authors:  Jillian H McCarthy; Tiffany P Hogan; David R Beukelman; Ilsa E Schwarz
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2014-02-11

6.  Instruments for augmentative and alternative communication for children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Yohanna Ferreira de Lima Antão; Acary Souza Bulle Oliveira; Renata Thaís de Almeida Barbosa; Tânia Brusque Crocetta; Regiani Guarnieri; Claudia Arab; Thaís Massetti; Thaiany Pedrozo Campos Antunes; Alan Patrício da Silva; Ĺtalla Maria Pinheiro Bezerra; Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro; Luiz Carlos de Abreu
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.365

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.