Literature DB >> 15321571

Failure of regional blockade for caesarean section.

M Garry1, S Davies.   

Abstract

This four-year retrospective study examined the quality of regional blockade for caesarean section. For patients having spinal anaesthesia, data were available on requirement for analgesic supplementation or conversion to general anaesthesia. In those having epidural anaesthesia, data were available only for conversion to general anaesthesia. A total of 1644 patients due to have caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were studied and of these, 48 (2.9%) required general anaesthesia at some stage. Of the 1610 patients in whom a caesarean section was started under spinal, 12 (0.75%) received general anaesthesia while 175 (10.9%) required some analgesic supplementation. Of the 827 patients in whom epidural analgesia was in progress for labour and a decision was made to proceed to caesarean section, a total of 87 patients (10.5%) needed general anaesthesia. Of those (763) in whom caesarean section was started under epidural, only 17 (2.2%) were given general anaesthesia because of intra-operative pain. Although these results may fall short of best practice, they may enable the anaesthetist to give more accurate information to patients so that better informed consent can be obtained.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 15321571     DOI: 10.1054/ijoa.2001.0903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth        ISSN: 0959-289X            Impact factor:   2.603


  9 in total

1.  [Spinal anesthesia in high-volume, low-concentration technique for Caesarean sections : Retrospective analysis].

Authors:  J Jokinen; V Adametz; M Kredel; R M Muellenbach; A Hönig; A Wöckel; J Dietl; N Roewer; P Kranke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  Adenekan At; Olateju So
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2011-10

4.  Type, management, and associated factors of failed spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zenebe Bekele; Hunduma Jisha
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-22

5.  Facial nerve paralysis and partial brachial plexopathy after epidural blood patch: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Radi Shahien; Abdalla Bowirrat
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Evaluation Effect of Aspiration of 0.2 ml of Cerebrospinal Fluid After Completion of Injection 0.5% Bupivacaine and Reinjection Into Subarachnoid Space on Sensory and Motor Block in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nahid Manouchehrian; Zahra Miri; Farzaneh Esna-Ashari; Farshid Rahimi-Bashar
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-25

7.  What is the failure rate in extending labour analgesia in patients with a body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m(2)compared with patients with a body mass index < 30 kg/m(2)? a retrospective pilot study.

Authors:  Victoria A Eley; Andre van Zundert; Leonie Callaway
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Implementing GRADE: calculating the risk difference from the baseline risk and the relative risk.

Authors:  Robert G Newcombe; Ralf Bender
Journal:  Evid Based Med       Date:  2013-08-22

9.  Epidural extension failure in obese women is comparable to that of non-obese women.

Authors:  V A Eley; A Chin; I Tham; J Poh; P Aujla; E Glasgow; H Brown; K Steele; L Webb; A van Zundert
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 2.105

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.