Literature DB >> 15321557

Epidural catheter function during labor predicts anesthetic efficacy for subsequent cesarean delivery.

E T Riley1, J Papasin.   

Abstract

One of the benefits of labor epidural analgesia is that the catheter can be used to initiate a surgical block should the need for cesarean delivery arise. However, sometimes it is not possible to obtain adequate surgical anesthesia via a previously placed labor epidural catheter and it is unknown what factors are associated with this failure. We retrospectively investigated the incidence of failure to convert a labor epidural to a successful surgical block in our institution over a period of one year and determined the factors associated with this failure. There were 246 cases in which a patient had an epidural catheter placed for labor and then had a cesarean delivery. Of these 246 cases, 220 developed surgical anesthesia using the catheter. In six cases the anesthesiologist did not attempt to use the epidural catheter for the cesarean delivery. In 20 cases (classified as failed blocks), the catheter was injected, but another method of anesthesia was then used. Factors associated with failure of the epidural block were an increased requirement for supplemental local anesthetic boluses during labor in order to provide adequate analgesia and that the attending anesthesiologist for the cesarean delivery was not a specialist in obstetric anesthesia. Most epidural catheters placed for labor can be used to induce a surgical block. When significantly more local anesthetic than usual is required to maintain analgesia during labor, however, the epidural catheter may not be functioning properly and consideration should be given to replacing it.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 15321557     DOI: 10.1054/ijoa.2001.0927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth        ISSN: 0959-289X            Impact factor:   2.603


  9 in total

1.  [Prolonged epidural labor analgesia increases risks of epidural analgesia failure for conversion to cesarean section].

Authors:  S Zhu; D Wei; D Zhang; F Jia; B Liu; J Zhang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2022-08-20

2.  Morbidly obese parturient: Challenges for the anaesthesiologist, including managing the difficult airway in obstetrics. What is new?

Authors:  Durga Prasada Rao; Venkateswara A Rao
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-11

3.  Algorithm for the anesthetic management of cesarean delivery in patients with unsatisfactory labor epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Sonia Vaida; Davide Cattano; Debra Hurwitz; Berend Mets
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-04-24

4.  Labor Epidural Analgesia to Cesarean Section Anesthetic Conversion Failure: A National Survey.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Andrew Gardner; Brendan Carvalho
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-06-02

5.  Efficacy of electrical stimulation on epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Young Sung Kim; Hyo Sung Kim; Hyerim Jeong; Chung Hun Lee; Mi Kyoung Lee; Sang Sik Choi
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Association of chorioamnionitis with failed conversion of epidural labor analgesia to cesarean delivery anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yumi Katakura; Yusuke Nagamine; Takahisa Goto; Hiroyuki Sumikura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Anesthetic considerations of parturients with obesity and obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Saravanan P Ankichetty; Pam Angle; Anita Shirley Joselyn; Vinod Chinnappa; Stephen Halpern
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10

8.  Incidence of cesarean section and analysis of risk factors for failed conversion of labor epidural to surgical anesthesia: A prospective, observational study in a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Samina Ismail; Shakaib Chugtai; Alia Hussain
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

9.  Epidural extension failure in obese women is comparable to that of non-obese women.

Authors:  V A Eley; A Chin; I Tham; J Poh; P Aujla; E Glasgow; H Brown; K Steele; L Webb; A van Zundert
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 2.105

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.