Literature DB >> 36073225

[Prolonged epidural labor analgesia increases risks of epidural analgesia failure for conversion to cesarean section].

S Zhu1, D Wei2, D Zhang3, F Jia4, B Liu4, J Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of epidural labor analgesia duration on the outcomes of different anesthetic approaches for conversion to cesarean section.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of pregnant women undergoing conversion from epidural labor analgesia to cesarean section at Sichuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital and Jinjiang District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between July, 2019 and June, 2020. For cesarean section, the women received epidural anesthesia when the epidural catheter was maintained in correct position with effective analgesia, spinal anesthesia at the discretion of the anesthesiologists, or general anesthesia in cases requiring immediate cesarean section or following failure of epidural anesthesia or spinal anesthesia. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff value of the analgesia duration using Youden index. The women were divided into two groups according to the cut off value for analyzing the relative risk using cross tabulations.
RESULTS: A total of 820 pregnant women undergoing conversion to cesarean section were enrolled in this analysis, including 615 (75.0%) in epidural anesthesia group, 186 (22.7%) in spinal anesthesia group, and 19 (2.3%) in general anesthesia group; none of the women experienced failure of epidural or spinal anesthesia. The mean anesthesia duration was 8.2±4.7 h in epidural anesthesia, 10.6±5.1 h in spinal anesthesia group, and 6.7 ± 5.2 h in general anesthesia group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that prolongation of analgesia duration by 1 h (OR=1.094, 95% CI: 1.057-1.132, P < 0.001) and an increase of cervical orifice by 1 cm (OR=1.066, 95% CI: 1.011-1.124, P=0.017) were independent risk factors for epidural analgesia failure. The cutoff value of analgesia duration was 9.5 h, and beyond that duration the relative risk of receiving spinal anesthesia was 1.204 (95% CI: 1.103-2.341, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Prolonged epidural labor analgesia increases the risk of failure of epidural analgesia for conversion to epidural anesthesia. In cases with an analgesia duration over 9.5 h, spinal anesthesia is recommended if immediate cesarean section is not required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analgesia duration; anesthesia method; cesarean section; epidural labor analgesia

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36073225      PMCID: PMC9458519          DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2022.08.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao        ISSN: 1673-4254


  28 in total

1.  Management of neuraxial anaesthesia for intrapartum caesarean delivery based on the quality of epidural labour analgesia: A case series.

Authors:  W Anton Visser; Roxanne D Zwijnenburg
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Conversion from regional to general anaesthesia for caesarean section: are we meeting the standards?

Authors:  M Purva; I Russell; M Kinsella
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 3.  Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour.

Authors:  Edgardo Abalos; Mónica Chamillard; Virginia Díaz; Julia Pasquale; João Paulo Souza
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 5.237

4.  International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  S M Kinsella; B Carvalho; R A Dyer; R Fernando; N McDonnell; F J Mercier; A Palanisamy; A T H Sia; M Van de Velde; A Vercueil
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 5.  Is Zhang the new Friedman: How should we evaluate the first stage of labor?

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 3.300

6.  Practice Bulletin No. 177: Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Increasing body mass index predicts increasing difficulty, failure rate, and time to discovery of failure of epidural anesthesia in laboring patients.

Authors:  Ayse O Kula; Matthias L Riess; Elizabeth H Ellinas
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 9.452

8.  Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong: should a pre-existing epidural catheter be discarded for an intrapartum cesarean section?

Authors:  Duk Kyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-07-13

9.  Anxious anticipation and pain: the influence of instructed vs conditioned threat on pain.

Authors:  Philipp Reicherts; Julian Wiemer; Antje B M Gerdes; Stefan M Schulz; Paul Pauli; Matthias J Wieser
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Extending epidural analgesia for intrapartum cesarean section following epidural labor analgesia: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chan Shen; Lin Chen; Chengjin Yue; Jing Cheng
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2020-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.