Literature DB >> 15319725

Carotid endarterectomy at the millennium: what interventional therapy must match.

Glenn M LaMuraglia1, David C Brewster, Ashby C Moncure, David J Dorer, Michael C Stoner, Samir K Trehan, Elizabeth C Drummond, William M Abbott, Richard P Cambria.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is supported by level 1 evidence as the standard treatment of severe carotid stenosis in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. As interventional techniques are emerging for treatment of this disease, this study was undertaken to provide a contemporary surgical standard for comparison to carotid stenting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the interval 1989 to 1999, 2236 isolated CEAs were performed on 1897 patients (62% male, 36% symptomatic, 4.6% reoperative procedures). Study endpoints included perioperative events, patient survival, late incidence of stroke, anatomic durability of CEA, and resource utilization changes during the study. Variables associated with complications, long-term and stroke free survival, restenosis, and resource utilization were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Perioperative complications occurred in 5.5% of CEA procedures, including any stroke/death (1.4%), neck hematoma (1.7%), cardiac complications (0.5%), and cranial nerve injury (0.4%). Actuarial survival at 5 and 10 years was 72.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69.3-73.5) and 44.7% (95% CI 41.7-47.9) respectively, with coronary artery disease (P < 0.0018), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < 0.00018) and diabetes mellitus (P < 0.0011) correlating with decreased longevity. The age- and sex-adjusted incidence of any stroke during follow-up was reduced by 22% (upper 0.35, lower 0.08) of predicted with the patient classification of hyperlipidemia (P < 0.0045) as the only protective factor. Analysis of CEA anatomic durability during a median follow-up period of 5.9 years identified a 7.7% failure rate (severe restenosis/occlusion, 4.5%; or reoperative CEA, 3.2%) with elevated serum cholesterol (P < 0.017) correlating with early restenosis. Resource utilization diminished (first versus last 2-year interval periods) for average hospital length of stay from 10.3 +/- 1.5 days to 4.3 +/- 0.7 days (P < 0.01) and preoperative contrast angiography from 87% +/- 1.4% to 10.3% +/- 4%.
CONCLUSIONS: These data delineate the safety, durability, and effectiveness in long-term stroke prevention of CEA. They provide a standard to which emerging catheter-based therapies for carotid stenosis should be compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15319725      PMCID: PMC1356444          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000137142.26925.3c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  56 in total

1.  Carotid angioplasty with stenting and carotid endarterectomy for high-risk patients.

Authors:  Germano Lucertini
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Stent angioplasty for cervical carotid artery stenosis in high-risk symptomatic NASCET-ineligible patients.

Authors:  A M Malek; R T Higashida; C C Phatouros; T E Lempert; P M Meyers; W S Smith; C F Dowd; V V Halbach
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Incidence and occurrence of total (first-ever and recurrent) stroke.

Authors:  G R Williams; J G Jiang; D B Matchar; G P Samsa
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Safety and efficacy of elective carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.

Authors:  F Shawl; W Kadro; M J Domanski; F L Lapetina; A A Iqbal; K G Dougherty; D D Weisher; J F Marquez; S T Shahab
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Cranial and cervical nerve injuries after repeat carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  A F AbuRahma; M A Choueiri
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry.

Authors:  Michael H Wholey; Nadim Al-Mubarek; Mark H Wholey
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Treatment of patients with combined coronary and carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  J J Ricotta; L P Wall
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.888

Review 8.  Antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke and other vascular events after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  S Engelter; P Lyrer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

9.  Lipid metabolism and occurrence of post-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty restenosis: role of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and paraoxonase/arylesterase.

Authors:  R Y L Zee; A Fernandez-Otiz; C Macaya; E Pintor; K Lindpaintner; A Fernandez-Cruz
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.824

10.  Outcome of carotid stent-assisted angioplasty versus open surgical repair of recurrent carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Andrew N Bowser; Dennis F Bandyk; Avery Evans; Michael Novotney; Fabian Leo; Martin R Back; Brad L Johnson; Murray L Shames
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  7 in total

1.  Association of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting With Stroke or Death Among Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Marc L Schermerhorn; Patric Liang; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Jack L Cronenwett; Brian W Nolan; Vikram S Kashyap; Grace J Wang; Raghu L Motaganahalli; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Carotid stenting done exclusively by vascular surgeons: first 175 cases.

Authors:  Mark K Eskandari; G Matthew Longo; Jon S Matsumura; Melina R Kibbe; Mark D Morasch; Kelley R Cardeira; William H Pearce
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Protamine reduces bleeding complications associated with carotid endarterectomy without increasing the risk of stroke.

Authors:  David H Stone; Brian W Nolan; Andres Schanzer; Philip P Goodney; Robert A Cambria; Donald S Likosky; Daniel B Walsh; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Carotid Endarterectomy: experience in 8743 cases.

Authors:  R Chiesa; G Melissano; R Castellano; Y Tshomba; E M Marone; E Civilini; D Astore; F Calliari; B Catenaccio; G Coppi; A Carozzo; R Mennella
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2009

5.  Risk Factors of Cerebral Infarction and Myocardial Infarction after Carotid Endarterectomy Analyzed by Machine Learning.

Authors:  Peng Bai; Yang Zhou; Yuan Liu; Gang Li; Zhengqian Li; Tao Wang; Xiangyang Guo
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Electroencephalography during Carotid Endarterectomy Predict Late Stroke but not Death.

Authors:  Natalie Domenick Sridharan; Rabih A Chaer; Partha D Thirumala; Jeffrey Balzer; Becky Long; Edith Tzeng; Michel S Makaroun; Efthymios D Avgerinos
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 1.466

7.  Critical appraisal of medical devices in the management of cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Michael J Schneck
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.423

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.