Literature DB >> 15318779

Effects of water use on arsenic release to well water in a confined aquifer.

Madeline B Gotkowitz1, Madeline E Schreiber, J A Simo.   

Abstract

Field-based experiments were designed to investigate the release of naturally occurring, low to moderate (< 50 microg/L) arsenic concentrations to well water in a confined sandstone aquifer in northeastern Wisconsin. Geologic, geochemical, and hydrogeologic data collected from a 115 m2 site demonstrate that arsenic concentrations in ground water are heterogeneous at the scale of the field site, and that the distribution of arsenic in ground water correlates to solid-phase arsenic in aquifer materials. Arsenic concentrations in a test well varied from 1.8 to 22 microg/L during experiments conducted under no, low, and high pumping rates. The quality of ground water consumed from wells under typical domestic water use patterns differs from that of ground water in the aquifer because of reactions that occur within the well. Redox conditions in the well can change rapidly in response to ground water withdrawals. The well borehole is an environment conducive to microbiological growth, and biogeochemical reactions also affect borehole chemistry. While oxidation of sulfide minerals appears to release arsenic to ground water in zones within the aquifer, reduction of arsenic-bearing iron (hydr)oxides is a likely mechanism of arsenic release to water having a long residence time in the well borehole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15318779     DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2004.tb02625.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ground Water        ISSN: 0017-467X            Impact factor:   2.671


  4 in total

1.  Flow and sorption controls of groundwater arsenic in individual boreholes from bedrock aquifers in central Maine, USA.

Authors:  Qiang Yang; Charles W Culbertson; Martha G Nielsen; Charles W Schalk; Carole D Johnson; Robert G Marvinney; Martin Stute; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Applying the common sense model to measure representations of arsenic contaminated well water.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson; Linda C Baumann; Roger L Brown
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2008-09

3.  Recommended Sampling Intervals for Arsenic in Private Wells.

Authors:  Brian J Mailloux; Nicholas A Procopio; Mark Bakker; Therese Chen; Imtiaz Choudhury; Kazi Matin Ahmed; M Rajib H Mozumder; Tyler Ellis; Steve Chillrud; Alexander van Geen
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  How or When Samples Are Collected Affects Measured Arsenic Concentration in New Drinking Water Wells.

Authors:  Melinda L Erickson; Helen F Malenda; Emily C Berquist
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.671

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.