Literature DB >> 1531825

A double-blind comparison of paroxetine, imipramine, and placebo in major depression.

R K Shrivastava1, S H Shrivastava, N Overweg, C L Blumhardt.   

Abstract

Results from a single-center, 6-week, double-blind, randomized prospective study of paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; imipramine; and placebo are reported. One hundred twenty outpatients with a moderate-to-severe DSM-III diagnosis of major depression were randomly assigned to one of the three treatments following a 4- to 10-day single-blind placebo washout period. Significant differences favoring paroxetine over placebo were present at endpoint on most major efficacy measures. Paroxetine was also well tolerated; 5 (15%) paroxetine and 5 (14%) placebo patients dropped out of the study due to adverse effects. Imipramine, however, was comparatively poorly tolerated. Forty-five percent of imipramine-treated patients (N = 17) dropped out of the study due to adverse effects. None of the efficacy measures showed a significant difference between imipramine and placebo. This finding was probably due to the high number of imipramine patients who discontinued before they could improve. These results support the efficacy of paroxetine in the treatment of major depression and underline its favorable side effect profile compared with tricyclic antidepressants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1531825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  9 in total

Review 1.  Evidence b(i)ased medicine--selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications.

Authors:  Hans Melander; Jane Ahlqvist-Rastad; Gertie Meijer; Björn Beermann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-31

2.  Does study design influence outcome?. The effects of placebo control and treatment duration in antidepressant trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 17.659

3.  Adverse effects associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Trindade; D Menon; L A Topfer; C Coloma
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Spotlight on paroxetine in psychiatric disorders in adults.

Authors:  Antona J Wagstaff; Susan M Cheer; Anna J Matheson; Douglas Ormrod; Karen L Goa
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Paroxetine: an update of its use in psychiatric disorders in adults.

Authors:  Antona J Wagstaff; Susan M Cheer; Anna J Matheson; Douglas Ormrod; Karen L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Less is more in antidepressant clinical trials: a meta-analysis of the effect of visit frequency on treatment response and dropout.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Timothy M Cooper; Amanda Persaud; Patrick J Brown; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 7.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Authors:  Janus Christian Jakobsen; Kiran Kumar Katakam; Anne Schou; Signe Gade Hellmuth; Sandra Elkjær Stallknecht; Katja Leth-Møller; Maria Iversen; Marianne Bjørnø Banke; Iggiannguaq Juhl Petersen; Sarah Louise Klingenberg; Jesper Krogh; Sebastian Elgaard Ebert; Anne Timm; Jane Lindschou; Christian Gluud
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Irving Kirsch; Brett J Deacon; Tania B Huedo-Medina; Alan Scoboria; Thomas J Moore; Blair T Johnson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  The efficacy of paroxetine and placebo in treating anxiety and depression: a meta-analysis of change on the Hamilton Rating Scales.

Authors:  Michael A Sugarman; Amy M Loree; Boris B Baltes; Emily R Grekin; Irving Kirsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.