Literature DB >> 15317603

Validation of a system of foot ulcer classification in diabetes mellitus.

K A Treece1, R M Macfarlane, N Pound, F L Game, W J Jeffcoate.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The lack of a simple, robust classification of diabetic foot ulcers has critically hampered research into optimum patterns of care. We have therefore attempted validation of the previously published S(AD) SAD system, which is based on grading of ulcer features using simple clinical methods. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective study in which 300 people with ulcers newly referred to a hospital-based multidisciplinary clinic between 1 January 2000 and 1 July 2002 were classified at the time of their first assessment. If a patient had more than one episode, the last to occur was selected as the index ulcer. If two or more ulcers were registered simultaneously, the one which was regarded as the more significant was chosen. Ulcers were categorized according to area, depth, sepsis, ischaemia and neuropathy. All patients were followed for at least 6 months, or until death if earlier. Outcome criteria used were healed and unhealed (unhealed persisting, unhealed at amputation or death) and were cross-tabulated with different baseline variables.
RESULTS: Ulcers healed in 209 of the 300 patients (69.7%), while 30.0 (10%) had been resolved by amputation (eight major; 22 minor) and 32 (10.7%) by death. Twenty-nine (9.7%) persisted unhealed. There were significant differences in outcome according to area (chi2=25.9, P < 0.001), depth (chi2=33.8, P < 0.001), sepsis (chi2=13.5, P = 0.004) and arteriopathy (chi2 = 33.7, P < 0.001), but not to denervation (chi2=5.1, P = 0.16). The strength of these associations was confirmed using Somers d: area (rs= -0.24, P < 0.001), depth (rs= -0.32, P < 0.001), sepsis (rs= -0.15, P < 0.01), arteriopathy (rs= -0.30, P < 0.001), denervation (rs= -0.10, P = 0.08). Logistic regression analysis using area, depth, sepsis and arteriopathy as independent variables, and those which contributed significantly to the model were area (P = 0.01), depth (P < 0.001) and arteriopathy (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that simple clinical methods can be used to categorize features of individual ulcers, and that area, depth and arteriopathy contribute independently to a model to predict outcome. A system of classification such as this is an essential requirement for the categorization of populations with similar features and similar prognosis, which may then be used as the basis for prospective research into optimal wound management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15317603     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01275.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  24 in total

Review 1.  Methods to assess area and volume of wounds - a systematic review.

Authors:  Line Bisgaard Jørgensen; Jens A Sørensen; Gregor Be Jemec; Knud B Yderstraede
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Mortality associated with acute Charcot foot and neuropathic foot ulceration.

Authors:  Juliette van Baal; Richard Hubbard; Fran Game; William Jeffcoate
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Comparing the Meggitt-Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: inter-observer analyses.

Authors:  Trientje B Santema; Ellie A Lenselink; Ron Balm; Dirk T Ubbink
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Predictive ability of the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system after first-time lower extremity revascularizations.

Authors:  Jeremy D Darling; John C McCallum; Peter A Soden; Raul J Guzman; Mark C Wyers; Allen D Hamdan; Hence J Verhagen; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 5.  Care of chronic wounds in palliative care and end-of-life patients.

Authors:  Christine A Chrisman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Factors associated with lower-extremity amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers in a Chinese tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Zi Guo; Chun Yue; Qiang Qian; Honghui He; Zhaohui Mo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-08-25       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Amputation as a marker of the quality of foot care in diabetes.

Authors:  W J Jeffcoate; W H van Houtum
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-12-11       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Risk factors for amputation in patients with diabetic foot infection: a prospective study.

Authors:  Serhat Uysal; Bilgin Arda; Meltem I Taşbakan; Şevki Çetinkalp; Ilgın Y Şimşir; Anıl M Öztürk; Ayşe Uysal; İlgen Ertam
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Primarily non-surgical management of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetes.

Authors:  F L Game; W J Jeffcoate
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  A classification of diabetic foot infections using ICD-9-CM codes: application to a large computerized medical database.

Authors:  Benjamin G Fincke; Donald R Miller; Robin Turpin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.