Literature DB >> 15316469

Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study.

Hans Pancherz1, Chrysoula Michailidou.   

Abstract

The aim of this long-term study was to assess the amount and direction of glenoid fossa displacement, condylar growth, and "effective" temporomandibular joint (TMJ) changes (= the sum of glenoid fossa displacement, condylar growth, and condylar position changes in the fossa) in 3 vertical facial-type groups of Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. A comparison was made between 38 normodivergent (ML/NSL= 26.5 degrees -36.5 degrees), 17 hypodivergent (ML/NSL <or= 26 degrees ), and 13 hyperdivergent (ML/NSL >or= 37 degrees ) subjects. Lateral headfilms from before, after, and 5 years after treatment were scrutinized. Glenoid fossa displacement, condylar growth, and "effective" TMJ changes were analyzed. Treatment changes: in all facial-type groups, the glenoid fossa was displaced anteriorly and inferiorly. No differences existed between the 3 groups. Condylar growth and "effective" TMJ changes were directed posteriorly and superiorly. The changes in posterior direction were more apparent in the hyperdivergent group than in the normodivergent and hypodivergent groups. Posttreatment changes: in all facial-type groups, the fossa was displaced posteriorly. No differences existed between the 3 groups. Condylar growth and "effective" TMJ changes were directed more vertically compared with the treatment changes. The changes in posterior direction were more pronounced in the hyperdivergent group than in the other 2 groups. It was found that the amount and direction of TMJ growth changes (fossa displacement, condylar growth, and "effective" TMJ changes) were only temporarily affected favorably in the sagittal direction by Herbst treatment. Condylar growth and "effective" TMJ changes were directed more posteriorly in hyperdivergent than in hypodivergent Herbst subjects. This was true for both treatment and posttreatment period changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15316469     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Interdisciplinary treatment of temporomandibular inflammation in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis].

Authors:  V Gönner-Ozkan; P Meyer; N Tzaribachev
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Mechanobehavior and mandibular ramus length in different facial phenotypes.

Authors:  Paige Covington Riddle; Jeffrey C Nickel; Ying Liu; Yoly M Gonzalez; Luigi M Gallo; R Scott Conley; Robert Dunford; Hongzeng Liu; Laura R Iwasaki
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.

Authors:  Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Linda Frye; Ulrich Gross; Jan Hourfar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Biomechanics of the mandible and growth extension.

Authors:  D Ihlow; H Dathe; J Fanghänel; P Proff; H Nägerl; W Hahn; D Kubein-Meesenburg; K M Thieme
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Three-dimensional condylar changes from Herbst appliance and multibracket treatment: A comparison with matched Class II elastics.

Authors:  Robert Y Wei; Arjun Atresh; Antonio Ruellas; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung Nguyen; Brent E Larson; Jonathan E Mangum; David J Manton; Paul M Schneider
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Dental and skeletal effects after total arch distalization using modified C-palatal plate on hypo- and hyperdivergent Class II malocclusions in adolescents.

Authors:  Chang Yoon Jung; Jae Hyun Park; Ja Hyeong Ku; Nam-Ki Lee; Yoonji Kim; Yoon-Ah Kook
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study.

Authors:  Megan LeCornu; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Hongtu Zhu; Chih-Da Wu; Brent Larson; Tung Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients with different vertical facial patterns treated with the Herbst appliance.

Authors:  Arjun Atresh; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Marilia Yatabe; Luciana Muniz; Tung Nguyen; Brent Larson; David J Manton; Paul M Schneider
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study.

Authors:  Niko C Bock; Erhard Gnandt; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Are morphologic and topographic alterations of the mandibular fossa after fixed functional treatment detectable on tomograms? Visual classification and morphometric analysis.

Authors:  Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Dania Booth; Jan Hourfar
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.