Literature DB >> 1531165

No evidence for a paternal interchromosomal effect from analysis of the origin of nondisjunction in Down syndrome patients with concomitant familial chromosome rearrangements.

A A Schinzel1, P A Adelsberger, F Binkert, S Basaran, S E Antonarakis.   

Abstract

The parental origin of the extra chromosome 21 was determined with DNA polymorphisms in seven families in whom the proband and one of the parents carried an additional chromosome rearrangement (balanced translocation or pericentric inversion) not involving chromosome 21. The balanced rearrangement was inherited from the mother in two families and from the father in five families, whereas the additional chromosome 21 was derived from the mother in all seven families. These findings are not in agreement with the hypothesis of a paternal interchromosomal effect. The latter would imply that a balanced rearrangement in the father would favor nondisjunction during meiosis in the germ cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1531165      PMCID: PMC1682467     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  31 in total

1.  Cytogenetic analysis of 400 sperm from three translocation heterozygotes.

Authors:  R H Martin; L Barclay; K Hildebrand; E Ko; S B Fowlow
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Genetic risk factors in human trisomy 21.

Authors:  M Mikkelsen; H Poulsen; N Tommerup
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1989

3.  Chromosome abnormalities found among 34,910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark.

Authors:  J Nielsen; M Wohlert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism located at D21S120.

Authors:  M Burmelster; D R Cox; R M Myers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  A genetic linkage map of 17 markers on human chromosome 21.

Authors:  A C Warren; S A Slaugenhaupt; J G Lewis; A Chakravarti; S E Antonarakis
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  R K Saiki; S Scharf; F Faloona; K B Mullis; G T Horn; H A Erlich; N Arnheim
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Evidence for reduced recombination on the nondisjoined chromosomes 21 in Down syndrome.

Authors:  A C Warren; A Chakravarti; C Wong; S A Slaugenhaupt; S L Halloran; P C Watkins; C Metaxotou; S E Antonarakis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The prevalence of translocations in parents of children with regular trisomy 21: a possible interchromosomal effect?

Authors:  R H Lindenbaum; M Hultén; A McDermott; M Seabright
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Structural rearrangements in the parents of children with primary trisomy 21.

Authors:  D A Couzin; J L Watt; G S Stephen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Molecular genetic approach to the characterization of the "Down syndrome region" of chromosome 21.

Authors:  M K McCormick; A Schinzel; M B Petersen; G Stetten; D J Driscoll; E S Cantu; L Tranebjaerg; M Mikkelsen; P C Watkins; S E Antonarakis
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.736

View more
  3 in total

1.  Familial four breakpoint complex chromosomal rearrangement as a cause of monosomy 9p22-->pter and trisomy 10p11.2-->pter and 11q21 analysed by dual and triple colour FISH.

Authors:  P Stankiewicz; E Kostyk; E Bocian; H Stańczak; J Parczewska; E Piatkowska; T Mazurczak; J J Pietrzyk
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  De novo microdeletion on an inherited Robertsonian translocation chromosome: a cause for dysmorphism in the apparently balanced translocation carrier.

Authors:  D T Bonthron; S J Smith; J Fantes; C M Gosden
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  The Interchromosomal Effect: Different Meanings for Different Organisms.

Authors:  Danny E Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.