Literature DB >> 15311033

The fate of the medically castrated testis: expectation versus reality.

Muta M Issa1, Anand Krishnan, Rafael Bouet, Mark R Young, Nedra Hood, John A Petros.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cosmetic expectation has a major role in influencing patient choice between medical and surgical castration, and yet to our knowledge the fate of the medically castrated testis has never been accurately tested and documented in the literature. We determined the weight of testes in patients receiving medical castration and compared it to that in a control group receiving primary surgical castration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 88 patients with prostate cancer who underwent bilateral simple orchiectomy with epididymal sparing. The study was done at Veterans Administration Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia. All procedures were performed using local anesthesia in an outpatient clinical setting. Patients were divided into 2 groups, namely 52 receiving luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist therapy prior to the procedure and 36 controls who were not. The weight of the testes was compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Median testicular weight significantly decreased following treatment with LH-RH agonist compared to the control group. Median weight of the testis was 7.0 gm (range 0.5 to 22.0) in the LH-RH agonist group compared to 15 gm (range 4.0 to 44.0) in the control group (p = 0.0049 x 10).
CONCLUSIONS: Medical castration with LH-RH agonist therapy significantly decreases the weight of testes and compromises the cosmetic outcome. Since cosmetic expectation has a major role in influencing patient choice between medical and surgical castration, patients should be fully informed about the significant testicular atrophy associated with medical castration before making their decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15311033     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000135831.19857.5c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  3 in total

1.  Can Subepididymal Orchiectomy Re-emerge as the Treatment of Choice in Patients with Advanced Prostatic Carcinoma?

Authors:  Mayank Agarwal; Madhu Sudan Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Subcapsular orchiectomy in the primary therapy of patients with bone metastasis in advanced prostate cancer: an anachronistic intervention?

Authors:  Oleg Rud; Julia Peter; Reza Kheyri; Christian Gilfrich; Ali M Ahmed; Wieland Boeckmann; Paul G Fabricius; Matthias May
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-09-14

3.  Cosmetic Appeal, HRQoL, and Effectiveness of Simple and Pseudotesticular Techniques of Orchidectomy in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ijeoma N C Chibuzo; Augustine O Takure; Olayiwola B Shittu; Linus I Okeke
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2021-11-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.