Literature DB >> 15310784

Health-related quality of life parameters as prognostic factors in a nonmetastatic breast cancer population: an international multicenter study.

Fabio Efficace1, Patrick Therasse, Martine J Piccart, Corneel Coens, Kristel van Steen, Marzena Welnicka-Jaskiewicz, Tanja Cufer, Jaroslaw Dyczka, Michail Lichinitser, Lois Shepherd, Hanneke de Haes, Mirjam A Sprangers, Andrew Bottomley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to evaluate whether baseline health-related quality of life (HRQOL) parameters are prognostic factors for survival in locally advanced breast cancer patients. Although the literature highlights the important role of HRQOL parameters in predicting survival in advanced metastatic disease, little evidence exists for earlier stages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The overall sample consisted of 448 patients randomly assigned to receive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil versus epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Patients were enrolled in 12 countries. HRQOL baseline scores were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for both univariate and multivariate analyses of survival. In addition, a bootstrap resampling technique was used to assess the stability of the outcomes. Bootstrap results were then applied for model averaging purposes as a means to account for the observed model selection uncertainty.
RESULTS: The final multivariate model retained inflammatory breast cancer (T4d) as the only factor predicting overall survival (OS) with a hazard ratio of 1.375 (95% CI, 1.027 to 1.840; P =.03). The presence of inflammatory breast cancer lowers the median survival time from 6.6 to 4.2 years (36% reduction). None of the preselected HRQOL variables were prognostic for OS or disease-free survival, in either the univariate or multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that baseline HRQOL parameters have no prognostic value in a nonmetastatic breast cancer population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15310784     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  38 in total

1.  Prognostic value of quality of life measured after treatment on subsequent survival in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wen-Ling Tsai; Chih-Yen Chien; Hsuan-Ying Huang; Kuan-Cho Liao; Fu-Min Fang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Quality of life assessment in surgical oncology trials.

Authors:  Kerry Avery; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Poor physical health predicts time to additional breast cancer events and mortality in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Nazmus Saquib; John P Pierce; Juliann Saquib; Shirley W Flatt; Loki Natarajan; Wayne A Bardwell; Ruth E Patterson; Marcia L Stefanick; Cynthia A Thomson; Cheryl L Rock; Lovell A Jones; Ellen B Gold; Njeri Karanja; Barbara A Parker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Mapping the QLQ-C30 quality of life cancer questionnaire to EQ-5D patient preferences.

Authors:  Ralph Crott; Andrew Briggs
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-05-16

5.  Predicting 5- and 10-year survival in older women with early-stage breast cancer: self-rated health and walking ability.

Authors:  Jessica A Eng; Kerri Clough-Gorr; Howard J Cabral; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Improvement in self-reported physical health predicts longer survival among women with a history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ruth E Patterson; Nazmus Saquib; Loki Natarajan; Cheryl L Rock; Barbara A Parker; Cynthia A Thomson; John P Pierce
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Factors affecting health-related quality of life in women with recurrent breast cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Myung Kyung Lee; Byung Ho Son; Sook Yeon Hwang; Wonshik Han; Jung-Hyun Yang; Seeyoun Lee; Young Ho Yun
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Capturing and Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes into Clinical Trials: Practical Considerations for Clinicians.

Authors:  Juliana Perez Botero; Gita Thanarajasingam; Rahma Warsame
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Predictive value of serial measurements of quality of life on all-cause mortality in prostate cancer patients: data from CaPSURE (cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor) database.

Authors:  Natalia Sadetsky; Alan Hubbard; Peter R Carroll; William Satariano
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Quality of life data as prognostic indicators of survival in cancer patients: an overview of the literature from 1982 to 2008.

Authors:  Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.