Literature DB >> 1531047

Mutant lambda repressors with increased operator affinities reveal new, specific protein-DNA contacts.

N Benson1, C Adams, P Youderian.   

Abstract

The binding specificities of four mutant lambda cI repressor proteins with increased affinities for operator DNA were examined. Two mutant repressors (Glu34----Lys and Glu83----Lys) have the same specificity of binding as wild-type repressor, whereas two (Gly48----Ser and Gly48----Asn) have new binding specificities. The Gly48----Asn mutant repressor recognizes lambda operators with changes at base pair 3 with a different order of affinity than wild-type repressor, suggesting that the side chain of Asn48 makes additional specific DNA contacts at or near this base pair. When paired with a change that disrupts the specific interaction of the amino-terminal arm of lambda repressor with DNA (Lys4----Gln), one change that increases the affinity of repressor (Gly48----Ser) suppresses the binding defect of the Lys4----Gln repressor, resulting in a double mutant repressor with a new binding specificity different than that of both its parents and of wild type. These results lend strong support to the model of direct recognition of the lambda operator by lambda repressor proposed from the crystal structure of the repressor/operator complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1531047      PMCID: PMC1204790     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  27 in total

1.  Structure of the lambda complex at 2.5 A resolution: details of the repressor-operator interactions.

Authors:  S R Jordan; C O Pabo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Interaction of mutant lambda repressors with operator and non-operator DNA.

Authors:  H C Nelson; R T Sauer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1986-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  A new-specificity mutant of 434 repressor that defines an amino acid-base pair contact.

Authors:  R P Wharton; M Ptashne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Apr 30-May 6       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  DNA site recognition and reduced specificity of the Eco RI endonuclease.

Authors:  C P Woodbury; O Hagenbüchle; P H von Hippel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1980-12-10       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  A perfectly symmetric lac operator binds the lac repressor very tightly.

Authors:  J R Sadler; H Sasmor; J L Betz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  How the lambda repressor and cro work.

Authors:  M Ptashne; A Jeffrey; A D Johnson; R Maurer; B J Meyer; C O Pabo; T M Roberts; R T Sauer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Primary structure of the lambda repressor.

Authors:  R T Sauer; R Anderegg
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1978-03-21       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Flexibility of the DNA-binding domains of trp repressor.

Authors:  C L Lawson; R G Zhang; R W Schevitz; Z Otwinowski; A Joachimiak; P B Sigler
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1988

9.  The three-dimensional structure of trp repressor.

Authors:  R W Schevitz; Z Otwinowski; A Joachimiak; C L Lawson; P B Sigler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Oct 31-Nov 6       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Interactions between DNA-bound repressors govern regulation by the lambda phage repressor.

Authors:  A D Johnson; B J Meyer; M Ptashne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  Inhibition of superinfection and the evolution of viral latency.

Authors:  Thomas W Berngruber; Franz J Weissing; Sylvain Gandon
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Evolutionary Ecology of Prokaryotic Immune Mechanisms.

Authors:  Stineke van Houte; Angus Buckling; Edze R Westra
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Recognition of DNA by the helix-turn-helix global regulatory protein Lrp is modulated by the amino terminus.

Authors:  Benjamin R Hart; Pankaj K Mishra; Robert E Lintner; Jennifer M Hinerman; Andrew B Herr; Robert M Blumenthal
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  The yeast centromere CDEI/Cpf1 complex: differences between in vitro binding and in vivo function.

Authors:  A Wilmen; H Pick; R K Niedenthal; M Sen-Gupta; J H Hegemann
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The challenge-phage assay reveals differences in the binding equilibria of mutant Escherichia coli Trp super-repressors in vivo.

Authors:  M Shapiro; D N Arvidson; J Pfau; P Youderian
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Biochemical characterization of L1 repressor mutants with altered operator DNA binding activity.

Authors:  Amitava Bandhu; Tridib Ganguly; Biswanath Jana; Amritangshu Chakravarty; Anindya Biswas; Subrata Sau
Journal:  Bacteriophage       Date:  2012-04-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.