AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aims of this study were to compare the ability of tests measuring fasting plasma glucose, 2-h plasma glucose and HbA1c levels in predicting specific diabetic retinopathy, and to determine the cut-off level of each measurement for diagnosing diabetes in a Japanese population. METHODS: In a total of 1637 subjects, fasting plasma glucose, 2-h plasma glucose and HbA1c levels were measured in a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, and diabetic retinopathy was assessed by ophthalmic examination. We calculated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves as well as the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy by deciles of the distribution of these glycaemic measurements. RESULTS: Of the subjects, 37 (2.3%) had diabetic retinopathy. The prevalence of retinopathy dramatically increased in the tenth decile of each variable. Analysis with ROC curves showed that the optimal cut-off levels for diagnosis of diabetes were 6.4 mmol/l for fasting plasma glucose, 11.1 mmol/l for 2-h plasma glucose, and 5.7% for HbA1c. The sensitivities for the cut-off point of the three measurements were identical (86.5%), and the specificities were similar (fasting plasma glucose 87.3%; 2-h plasma glucose 89.6%; HbA1c 90.1%). The area under the ROC curve for 2-h plasma glucose (96.1%) was slightly but not significantly larger than that for fasting plasma glucose (90.0%) and that for HbA1c (94.5%). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: . Our findings suggest that measuring fasting plasma glucose or HbA1c is just as useful as measuring 2-h plasma glucose for the diagnosis of diabetes, and that the cut-off point for diagnostic fasting plasma glucose level is lower than that of the current diagnostic criteria.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aims of this study were to compare the ability of tests measuring fasting plasma glucose, 2-h plasma glucose and HbA1c levels in predicting specific diabetic retinopathy, and to determine the cut-off level of each measurement for diagnosing diabetes in a Japanese population. METHODS: In a total of 1637 subjects, fasting plasma glucose, 2-h plasma glucose and HbA1c levels were measured in a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, and diabetic retinopathy was assessed by ophthalmic examination. We calculated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves as well as the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy by deciles of the distribution of these glycaemic measurements. RESULTS: Of the subjects, 37 (2.3%) had diabetic retinopathy. The prevalence of retinopathy dramatically increased in the tenth decile of each variable. Analysis with ROC curves showed that the optimal cut-off levels for diagnosis of diabetes were 6.4 mmol/l for fasting plasma glucose, 11.1 mmol/l for 2-h plasma glucose, and 5.7% for HbA1c. The sensitivities for the cut-off point of the three measurements were identical (86.5%), and the specificities were similar (fasting plasma glucose 87.3%; 2-h plasma glucose 89.6%; HbA1c 90.1%). The area under the ROC curve for 2-h plasma glucose (96.1%) was slightly but not significantly larger than that for fasting plasma glucose (90.0%) and that for HbA1c (94.5%). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: . Our findings suggest that measuring fasting plasma glucose or HbA1c is just as useful as measuring 2-h plasma glucose for the diagnosis of diabetes, and that the cut-off point for diagnostic fasting plasma glucose level is lower than that of the current diagnostic criteria.
Authors: T Ohmura; K Ueda; Y Kiyohara; I Kato; H Iwamoto; K Nakayama; K Nomiyama; S Ohmori; T Yoshitake; A Shinkawu Journal: Diabetologia Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: M S Hutchinson; R M Joakimsen; I Njølstad; H Schirmer; Y Figenschau; R Jorde Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Mustafa Kanat; Diedre Winnier; Luke Norton; Nazik Arar; Chris Jenkinson; Ralph A Defronzo; Muhammad A Abdul-Ghani Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Silmara Ao Leite; Robyn L Anderson; David M Kendall; Arlene M Monk; Richard M Bergenstal Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 3.320
Authors: Yiling J Cheng; Edward W Gregg; Linda S Geiss; Giuseppina Imperatore; Desmond E Williams; Xinzhi Zhang; Ann L Albright; Catherine C Cowie; Ronald Klein; Jinan B Saaddine Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 17.152