OBJECTIVE: Intravenous (IV) injection is currently the normal method for transplanting hematopoietic cells. However, the problem of seeding efficiency and homing is relevant especially when a limited number of stem cells is available. Intra-bone marrow (IBM) injection of bone marrow cells (BMCs) may overcome this problem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Irradiated (750 cGy) C57BL/6J mice were transplanted with 1 x 10(5) BMCs harvested from transgenic mice expressing an enhanced version of the green fluorescent protein (EGFP+) via IBM or with 1 x 10(6) EGFP+ BMCs via IV. Irradiated (320 cGy) NOD/SCID mice were transplanted with 1 x 10(6) human cord blood (CB) cells via IBM or with 1 x 10(7) human CB cells via IV. RESULTS: In C57BL/6J mice after 90 days, the fraction of EGFP+ cells harvested was 37% and 53% in IV-treated and IBM-treated (contralateral tibia and femur in the IBM) mice, respectively: the expansion folds were 114 and 1760, respectively. In NOD/SCID mice, the percentages of CD45+ cells and CD45+/CD34+ cells were, at 30 days, 3.3% and 0.3% in IV-treated mice, and 4.4% and 1.1% in IBM-treated mice. At 60 days, the percentages of CD45+ cells and CD45+/CD34+ cells were 2.1% and 0.3% in IV-treated mice and 1.4% and 0.4% in IBM-treated mice. At day 90 the percentages of CD45+ cells and CD45+/CD34+ cells were 3% and 0.3% in IV-treated mice and 2.3% and 0.4% in IBM-treated mice. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that IBM transplantation is associated with a seeding efficiency 15 times greater than IV transplantation. IBM transplantation may improve the results of transplant and may be useful in several settings: 1) when a limited number of hematopoietic progenitors are available; and 2) in experiments aiming to place in the bone marrow stem cells of other lineages (CNS, muscle, etc.).
OBJECTIVE: Intravenous (IV) injection is currently the normal method for transplanting hematopoietic cells. However, the problem of seeding efficiency and homing is relevant especially when a limited number of stem cells is available. Intra-bone marrow (IBM) injection of bone marrow cells (BMCs) may overcome this problem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Irradiated (750 cGy) C57BL/6J mice were transplanted with 1 x 10(5) BMCs harvested from transgenic mice expressing an enhanced version of the green fluorescent protein (EGFP+) via IBM or with 1 x 10(6) EGFP+ BMCs via IV. Irradiated (320 cGy) NOD/SCIDmice were transplanted with 1 x 10(6) human cord blood (CB) cells via IBM or with 1 x 10(7) human CB cells via IV. RESULTS: In C57BL/6J mice after 90 days, the fraction of EGFP+ cells harvested was 37% and 53% in IV-treated and IBM-treated (contralateral tibia and femur in the IBM) mice, respectively: the expansion folds were 114 and 1760, respectively. In NOD/SCIDmice, the percentages of CD45+ cells and CD45+/CD34+ cells were, at 30 days, 3.3% and 0.3% in IV-treated mice, and 4.4% and 1.1% in IBM-treated mice. At 60 days, the percentages of CD45+ cells and CD45+/CD34+ cells were 2.1% and 0.3% in IV-treated mice and 1.4% and 0.4% in IBM-treated mice. At day 90 the percentages of CD45+ cells and CD45+/CD34+ cells were 3% and 0.3% in IV-treated mice and 2.3% and 0.4% in IBM-treated mice. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that IBM transplantation is associated with a seeding efficiency 15 times greater than IV transplantation. IBM transplantation may improve the results of transplant and may be useful in several settings: 1) when a limited number of hematopoietic progenitors are available; and 2) in experiments aiming to place in the bone marrow stem cells of other lineages (CNS, muscle, etc.).
Authors: N Kurita; M Gosho; Y Yokoyama; T Kato; N Obara; M Sakata-Yanagimoto; Y Hasegawa; N Uchida; S Takahashi; Y Kouzai; Y Atsuta; M Kurata; T Ichinohe; S Chiba Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Mateusz Adamiak; Joseph B Moore; John Zhao; Ahmed Abdelbaset-Ismail; Kamil Grubczak; Sylwia Rzeszotek; Marcin Wysoczynski; Mariusz Z Ratajczak Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Troy C Lund; Anthony E Boitano; Colleen S Delaney; Elizabeth J Shpall; John E Wagner Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Julia Steitz; Mamdouh Afify; Marwa S Khattab; Huda O AbuBakr; Kassem G El Iraqi; Naglaa A AbdElKader; Mervat M Kamel; Khaled Hamed Salem Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 6.832