| Literature DB >> 23093864 |
Cecilia Marini1, Marina Podestà, Michela Massollo, Selene Capitanio, Francesco Fiz, Silvia Morbelli, Massimo Brignone, Andrea Bacigalupo, Michele Piana, Francesco Frassoni, Gianmario Sambuceti.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in comprehension of molecular mechanisms governing bone marrow (BM) homing of hematopoietic stem cells, cord blood transplant (CBT) suffers from a slow rate of hematopoietic recovery. Intrabone (i.b.) injection has been proposed as a method able to improve speed of BM engraftment with respect to conventional i.v. protocols. However, the mechanisms underlying this benefit are largely unknown. AIM: To verify whether i.b.-CBT determines a local engraftment able to predict the reconstitution of recipient hematopoiesis. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with hematologic malignancies received i.b. injection into both iliac crests of 3.2 ± 0.68 ∗ 107/kg cord blood cells. One month following i.b.-CBT, PET-CT imaging was performed. Maximal standardized uptake values (SUVs) were assessed in BM of both iliac crests and in all lumbar vertebrae.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23093864 PMCID: PMC3471032 DOI: 10.1155/2012/767369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol ISSN: 1110-7243
Main patients' characteristics.
| Age | Gender | Disease | Disease status | HLA match | Overall number of infused donor cells (×107/kg) | Number of donor CD34+ cells (×105/kg) | Time to PMN recovery (≥0.5 × 109/L), days | Time to PLT recovery (≥20 × 109/L), days | PLT count at day 100 (×109/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66 | M | nHL | Refractory | 4/6 | 2.13 | 0.68 | 32 | 48 | 130 |
| 36 | F | AML | 2 CR | 4/6 | 4.15 | 2.32 | 22 | 30 | 28 |
| 25 | M | CML | Refractory | 4/6 | 2.29 | 0.41 | 21 | 23 | 165 |
| 44 | M | AML | 2 CR | 4/6 | 4.07 | 1.26 | 27 | 38 | 101 |
| 49 | F | AML | 1 CR (HR) | 4/6 | 3.40 | 2.20 | 23 | 33 | 122 |
| 48 | M | AML/HD | Secondary after HD | 4/6 | 2.85 | 2.70 | 27 | 45 | † |
| 47 | M | AML | 1 CR (HR) | 4/6 | 2.00 | 1.69 | 18 | 38 | 111 |
| 42 | M | ALL | Refractory | 4/6 | 4.40 | 0.86 | 27 | 13 | † |
| 34 | M | HD | Refractory | 4/6 | 3.49 | 1.96 | 24 | 42 | 124 |
| 37 | M | ALL | Refractory | 4/6 | 3.12 | 1.04 | 14 | 34 | 175 |
| 22 | F | CML | Disease relapse | 4/6 | 5.20 | 3.38 | 14 | 18 | / |
| 43 | F | HD | Refractory | 4/6 | 3.28 | 0.80 | 23 | 32 | 148 |
| 33 | M | ALL | Refractory | 4/6 | 3.45 | 1.14 | 23 | 26 | 77 |
| 49 | F | AML | 1 CR (HR) | 4/6 | 3.87 | 2.67 | 22 | 35 | 155 |
| 50 | M | AML | Refractory | 4/6 | 2.74 | 0.53 | 29 | 44 | 100 |
| 58 | M | nHL | Refractory | 4/6 | 2.58 | 1.58 | 24 | 38 | 127 |
| 46 | F | CML | Disease relapse | 4/6 | 1.97 | 1.60 | 24 | 39 | / |
| 38 | M | AML | 2 CR | 4/6 | 2.19 | 1.00 | 19 | 37 | 212 |
| 36 | M | AML | Refractory | 4/6 | 2.46 | 1.00 | 19 | 29 | † |
| 56 | M | CML | Refractory | 4/6 | 2.90 | 1.67 | 19 | 34 | 118 |
| 58 | M | PMF | Refractory | 4/6 | 3.36 | 1.71 | 24 | 36 | 51 |
ALL: acute lymphatic leukemia; AML: acute myeloid leukemia; CML: chronic myeloid leukemia; HD: Hodgkin's disease; nHL: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; PMF: primary myelofibrosis; 1 CR: first complete remission; 2 CR: second complete remission; HR: high risk; PMN: polymorphonucleated cells; PLT: platelets; †Patient died.
Main clinical characteristics and SUV values of control subjects.
| Age | Gender | Disease | Iliac crest | Vertebrae | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | M | NHL | 1.82 | 3.98 | |
| 38 | M | NHL | 1.96 | 4.91 | |
| 70 | M | NHL | 1.35 | 3.23 | |
| 35 | F | HD | 1.92 | 2.90 | |
| 65 | M | HD | 2.38 | 3.85 | |
| 63 | M | NHL | 2.09 | 3.39 | |
| 59 | F | NHL | 0.65 | 3.61 | |
| 35 | M | HD | 1.96 | 6.13 | |
| 39 | M | HD | 1.47 | 4.97 | |
| 51 | M | NHL | 3.07 | 5.89 | |
| 38 | M | NHL | 1.04 | 2.71 | |
| 57 | F | NHL | 1.81 | 4.68 | |
| 40 | M | NHL | 2.24 | 8.35 | |
| 46 | M | NHL | 2.00 | 4.34 | |
| 55 | M | NHL | 2.18 | 3.78 | |
| 39 | F | HD | 0.62 | 2.15 | |
| 31 | M | HD | 1.85 | 3.12 | |
| 30 | M | HD | 1.83 | 3.05 | |
|
| |||||
| Mean ± SD | 47 ± 12 | 1.79 ± 0.60 | 4.17 ± 1.49 | ||
Figure 1(a) Bone marrow (BM) segmentation of both iliac crests (bottom) and five lumbar vertebrae (top), using PET-CT images. Analyzed volumes are shown in green for the former and blue for the latter. (b) Metabolic activity trend patient by patient in the injected sites compared with remote BM; maximal SUVs in the iliac crests were slightly but significantly higher than in the lumbar spine. On the contrary, the same analysis (c) showed the opposite results in controls.
Figure 2Whole body PET maximum intensity projections of a patient (a) and a control subject (b). Tracer retention in iliac crests is clearly visible in the patient and not in the control subject.
Figure 3Correlation existing between maximal standardized FDG uptake values (SUV) within iliac crests and lumbar vertebrae. The tight correlation between injected sites and lumbar vertebrae metabolism confirmed a close parallelism between the degree of BM glucose consumption in these two different districts.
Figure 4Correlation between follow-up platelets counts (day 100) and metabolic activity in both the iliac crests at day 30 after IB-CBT; maximal SUVs in the injected sites were significantly and directly correlated with the follow-up platelets recovery.
Figure 5Lack of correlation between late follow-up platelets count (day 100) and maximal SUVs in lumbar vertebrae; the metabolic activity in the remote BM did not predict the late hematopoietic recovery.