Literature DB >> 15308251

Stabilisation of sagittal split advancement osteotomies with miniplates: a prospective, multicentre study with two-year follow-up. Part II. Radiographic parameters.

W A Borstlap1, P J W Stoelinga, T J M Hoppenreijs, M A van't Hof.   

Abstract

This prospective study implied a two-year follow-up on a group of patients that underwent a Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO) for advancement (n=222) of the mandible that were treated in seven institutions following the same treatment protocol. The aim of Part II of this study was to correlate the clinical findings on stability and relapse as reported in Part I (clinical parameters) of this series of articles with the cephalometric findings. The mean skeletal relapse at pogonion of the whole group after two years was 0.9 mm. The clinically stable group, however, had only 0.4 mm relapse, whereas the clinical relapse group showed a mean relapse of 3.3 mm. The findings underline a relationship between the amount of advancement and relapse. The tendency for both, horizontal and vertical movement is the same, i.e., the larger the surgery effect, the larger the relapse. The angle post plane/mandibular plane showed the highest explained variance 9%. Patients with a high mandibular plane angle may be more prone to relapse. The explained variance of all considered prognostic factors together, however, is small (13%). The findings of this study express that patients with a clinical stable occlusion after a BSSO advancement, stabilised with miniplates, have a minimal to no skeletal relapse as measured on the cephalometric radiograms. The clinically non-stable group, however, appeared to have considerable skeletal relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15308251     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  9 in total

1.  Skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split advancement and setback osteotomy of the mandible with miniplate fixation.

Authors:  Srinivasan Hanumantha Rao; Loganathan Selvaraj; Arathy S Lankupalli
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-11-20

2.  Evaluation of the rigidity of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixation using four designs of biodegradable and titanium plates--a numerical study.

Authors:  Safieh Albougha; Mhd Hassan Albogha; Mhd Ayham Darwich; Khaldoun Darwich
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-03-19

3.  Does Mandibular Advancement Orthognathic Surgery Lead to TMJ Dysfunction in Skeletal Class 2 Patients? A Quasi-Experimental Trial in an Iranian Population.

Authors:  Majid Eshghpour; Zahra Shooshtari; Ali Labafchi; Nazgol Radvar; Elahe Tohidi; Sahand Samieirad
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03

4.  Closure of anterior open bites with mandibular surgery: advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

Authors:  Joseph E Van Sickels; Aaron Wallender
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-09-04

5.  One-year stability of the mandibular advancement and counterclockwise rotation for correction of the skeletal class II malocclusion and high mandibular plane angle: Dental and skeletal aspect.

Authors:  Muhammad Ruslin; Andi Sitti Hajrah Yusuf; Tymour Forouzanfar; Rokus Barendregt Greebe; Dirk Bram Tuinzing; Sri Astuti Thamrin; Paolo Boffano; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Hybrid fixation in the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for lower jaw advancement.

Authors:  Felipe Ladeira Pereira; Marcos Janson; Eduardo Sant'Ana
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Patient satisfaction after orthognathic surgery: a 3 year follow-up of 60 high-angle Class II individuals.

Authors:  Nina Torgersbråten; Arild Stenvik; Lisen Espeland
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Analysis of Sagittal Position Changes of the Condyle After Mandibular Setback Surgery Across the Four Different Types of Plating Systems.

Authors:  Jeong-Kui Ku; Sun-Kyu Choi; Jung-Gon Lee; Han-Chang Yu; Sang-Yun Kim; Young-Kyun Kim; Yonsoo Shin; Nam-Ki Lee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.172

Review 9.  TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.