Literature DB >> 15305383

Comparison of the prognostic potential of hyaluronic acid, hyaluronidase (HYAL-1), CD44v6 and microvessel density for prostate cancer.

Sinan Ekici1, Wolfgang H Cerwinka, Robert Duncan, Pablo Gomez, Francisco Civantos, Mark S Soloway, Vinata B Lokeshwar.   

Abstract

Despite the development of nomograms designed to evaluate a prostate cancer (PCa) patient's prognosis, the information has been limited to PSA, clinical stage, Gleason score and tumor volume estimates. We compared the prognostic potential of 4 histologic markers, hyaluronic acid (HA), HYAL-1-type hyaluronidase (HAase), CD44v6 and microvessel density (MVD) using immunohistochemistry. HA is a glycosaminoglycan that promotes tumor metastasis. CD44 glycoproteins serve as cell surface receptors for HA, and the CD44v6 isoform is associated with tumor metastasis. HYAL-1-type HAase is expressed in tumor cells and, like other HAases, degrades HA into angiogenic fragments. Archival PCa specimens (n=66) were obtained from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized PCa and had a minimum follow-up of 72 months (range 72-131 months, mean 103 months). For HA, HYAL-1 and CD44v6 staining and MVD determination, a biotinylated HA-binding protein, an anti-HYAL-1 IgG, an anti-CD44v6 IgG and an anti-CD34 IgG were used, respectively. HA and HYAL-1 staining was classified as either low- or high-grade. CD44v6 staining and MVD were evaluated quantitatively and then grouped as either low- or high-grade. Using 72 months as the cut-off limit for evaluating biochemical recurrence, HA, HYAL-1, combined HA-HYAL-1, CD44v6 and MVD staining predicted progression with 96%, 84%, 84%, 68% and 76% sensitivity, respectively. Specificity was, 61% (HA), 80.5% (HYAL-1), 87.8% (HA-HYAL-1), 56.1% (CD44v6) and 61% (MVD). Sensitivity and specificity values for each marker did not change significantly in a subset of 45 patients for whom follow-up of longer than 112 months was available. In univariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model, preoperative PSA, Gleason sum, margin status, seminal vesicle, extraprostatic extension (EPE), HA, HYAL-1, HA-HYAL-1 and MVD, but not CD44v6, age and clinical stage, were significant in predicting biochemical recurrence (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis using stepwise selection, only preoperative PSA (hazard ratio/unit PSA change=1.086, p < 0.0001), EPE (hazard ratio=6.22, p=0.0016) and HYAL-1 (hazard ratio=8.196, p=0.0009)/HA-HYAL-1 (hazard ratio=5.191, p=0.0021) were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. HA was an independent predictor of prognosis if HYAL-1 staining inference was not included in the multivariate model. In our retrospective study with 72- to 131-month follow-up, EPE, preoperative PSA and HYAL-1 either alone or together with HA (i.e., combined HA-HYAL-1) were independent prognostic indicators for PCa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15305383     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  39 in total

1.  Antitumor activity of hyaluronic acid synthesis inhibitor 4-methylumbelliferone in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Vinata B Lokeshwar; Luis E Lopez; Daniel Munoz; Andrew Chi; Samir P Shirodkar; Soum D Lokeshwar; Diogo O Escudero; Neetika Dhir; Norman Altman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Concurrent expression of hyaluronan biosynthetic and processing enzymes promotes growth and vascularization of prostate tumors in mice.

Authors:  Melanie A Simpson
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Molecular characterization of kidney cancer: association of hyaluronic acid family with histological subtypes and metastasis.

Authors:  Andrew Chi; Samir P Shirodkar; Diogo O Escudero; Obi O Ekwenna; Travis J Yates; Rajinikanth Ayyathurai; Michael Garcia-Roig; Jeffrey C Gahan; Murugesan Manoharan; Vincent G Bird; Vinata B Lokeshwar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The significance of monoamine oxidase-A expression in high grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Donna M Peehl; Marc Coram; Htet Khine; Stephen Reese; Rosalie Nolley; Hongjuan Zhao
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Indocyanine green-loaded nanoparticles for image-guided tumor surgery.

Authors:  Tanner K Hill; Asem Abdulahad; Sneha S Kelkar; Frank C Marini; Timothy E Long; James M Provenzale; Aaron M Mohs
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 4.774

6.  Differential DNA methylation profile of key genes in malignant prostate epithelial cells transformed by inorganic arsenic or cadmium.

Authors:  Katherine E Pelch; Erik J Tokar; B Alex Merrick; Michael P Waalkes
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Association of hyaluronic acid family members (HAS1, HAS2, and HYAL-1) with bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

Authors:  Mario W Kramer; Diogo O Escudero; Soum D Lokeshwar; Roozbeh Golshani; Obi O Ekwenna; Kristell Acosta; Axel S Merseburger; Mark Soloway; Vinata B Lokeshwar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Spontaneous metastasis of prostate cancer is promoted by excess hyaluronan synthesis and processing.

Authors:  Alamelu G Bharadwaj; Joy L Kovar; Eileen Loughman; Christian Elowsky; Gregory G Oakley; Melanie A Simpson
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 9.  Hyaluronan: a simple polysaccharide with diverse biological functions.

Authors:  Kevin T Dicker; Lisa A Gurski; Swati Pradhan-Bhatt; Robert L Witt; Mary C Farach-Carson; Xinqiao Jia
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 10.  Emerging roles for hyaluronidase in cancer metastasis and therapy.

Authors:  Caitlin O McAtee; Joseph J Barycki; Melanie A Simpson
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 6.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.