Literature DB >> 15304143

Involving patients in decision making and communicating risk: a longitudinal evaluation of doctors' attitudes and confidence during a randomized trial.

Adrian Edwards1, Glyn Elwyn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Important barriers to the wider implementation of shared decision making (SDM) and risk communication in practice remain. The attitudes of professionals undergoing training in these approaches may inform how to overcome these barriers, but there are few such data yet available. AIM: To identify the attitudes of professionals during participation in a large practice-based intervention study with substantial individual exposure to SDM and risk communication, and to assess their confidence with these approaches and reported frequency of implementing them. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty general practitioners (GPs) who had been in practice between 1 and 10 years, and participated in an explanatory trial lasting 6 months. The trial interventions comprised training in SDM skills and the use of risk communication materials. The doctors consulted with up to 48 patients each (mean = 40, half of them audio-taped) for the study.
METHODS: Questionnaire assessments before and after each training stage.
RESULTS: The GPs indicated positive attitudes towards involving patients and towards the training interventions. They indicated that the risk information packs were applicable but had used them only occasionally with patients outside the trial. No statistically significant changes were associated with the specific interventions in terms of doctors' confidence in discussing risk information after the risk communication intervention, or attitudes to patient involvement after the SDM intervention. Most attitudes and confidence ratings showed positive changes during the course of the trial as a cohort effect. Such positive changes were associated with female doctors more than male doctors, but not with MRCGP (postgraduate vocational) qualification. Time constraints remained important throughout the study in not implementing the approach more frequently.
CONCLUSIONS: Professionals appear receptive to patient involvement, and willing to acquire the relevant skills. SDM and risk communication training did not appear to contribute differentially to this. Practical barriers such as time constraints should probably be addressed with greater priority than the precise content of training or continuing professional development initiatives if 'involvement' is to become a commoner experience for patients in primary care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15304143     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2004.00502.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  27 in total

Review 1.  Outcome-Relevant Effects of Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Katarina Hauser; Armin Koerfer; Kathrin Kuhr; Christian Albus; Stefan Herzig; Jan Matthes
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Older patients and their GPs: shared decision making in enhancing trust.

Authors:  Joanne E Butterworth; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: a conceptual framework to guide research.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-02-15

4.  Involve the patient and pass the MRCGP: investigating shared decision making in a consulting skills examination using a validated instrument.

Authors:  A Niroshan Siriwardena; Adrian Gk Edwards; Peter Campion; Adrian Freeman; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Child and caregiver involvement and shared decision-making during asthma pediatric visits.

Authors:  Betsy L Sleath; Delesha M Carpenter; Robyn Sayner; Guadalupe X Ayala; Dennis Williams; Stephanie Davis; Gail Tudor; Karin Yeatts
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.515

6.  Has patients' involvement in the decision-making process changed over time?

Authors:  Atie van den Brink-Muinen; Sandra M van Dulmen; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Adriaan Ph Visser; François G Schellevis; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Mutual influence in shared decision making: a collaborative study of patients and physicians.

Authors:  Beth A Lown; William D Clark; Janice L Hanson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument.

Authors:  Nicolas Couët; Sophie Desroches; Hubert Robitaille; Hugues Vaillancourt; Annie Leblanc; Stéphane Turcotte; Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Evaluating attitudes of first-year residents to shared decision making.

Authors:  Jon G Caldwell
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2008-07-10

10.  Can consultation skills training change doctors' behaviour to increase involvement of patients in making decisions about standard treatment and clinical trials: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  P Butow; R Brown; J Aldridge; I Juraskova; P Zoller; F Boyle; M Wilson; J Bernhard
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.