Literature DB >> 15870359

Architecture of a nascent Sphingomonas sp. biofilm under varied hydrodynamic conditions.

V P Venugopalan1, M Kuehn, M Hausner, D Springael, P A Wilderer, S Wuertz.   

Abstract

The architecture of a Sphingomonas biofilm was studied during early phases of its formation, using strain L138, a gfp-tagged derivative of Sphingomonas sp. strain LB126, as a model organism and flow cells and confocal laser scanning microscopy as experimental tools. Spatial and temporal distribution of cells and exopolymer secretions (EPS) within the biofilm, development of microcolonies under flow conditions representing varied Reynolds numbers, and changes in diffusion length with reference to EPS production were studied by sequential sacrificing of biofilms grown in multichannel flow cells and by time-lapse confocal imaging. The area of biofilm in terms of microscopic images required to ensure representative sampling varied by an order of magnitude when area of cell coverage (2 x 10(5) microm(2)) or microcolony size (1 x 10(6) microm(2)) was the biofilm parameter under investigation. Hence, it is necessary to establish the inherent variability of any biofilm metric one is attempting to quantify. Sphingomonas sp. strain L138 biofilm architecture consisted of microcolonies and extensive water channels. Biomass and EPS distribution were maximal at 8 to 9 mum above the substratum, with a high void fraction near the substratum. Time-lapse confocal imaging and digital image analysis showed that growth of the microcolonies was not uniform: adjacently located colonies registered significant growth or no growth at all. Microcolonies in the biofilm had the ability to move across the attachment surface as a unit, irrespective of fluid flow direction, indicating that movement of microcolonies is an inherent property of the biofilm. Width of water channels decreased as EPS production increased, resulting in increased diffusion distances in the biofilm. Changing hydrodynamic conditions (Reynolds numbers of 0.07, 52, and 87) had no discernible influence on the characteristics of microcolonies (size, shape, or orientation with respect to flow) during the first 24 h of biofilm development. Inherent factors appear to have overriding influence, vis-a-vis environmental factors, on early stages of microcolony development under these laminar flow conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15870359      PMCID: PMC1087527          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2677-2686.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  54 in total

Review 1.  Genetic analyses of bacterial biofilm formation.

Authors:  L A Pratt; R Kolter
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 2.  Biofilm, city of microbes.

Authors:  P Watnick; R Kolter
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Biofilm formation as microbial development.

Authors:  G O'Toole; H B Kaplan; R Kolter
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 15.500

4.  Phylogenetic Composition, Spatial Structure, and Dynamics of Lotic Bacterial Biofilms Investigated by Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Removal of dibenzofuran, dibenzo-p-dioxin, and 2-chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin from soils inoculated with Sphingomonas sp. strain RW1.

Authors:  R U Halden; B G Halden; D F Dwyer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Structures and properties of gellan polymers produced by sphingomonas paucimobilis ATCC 31461 from lactose compared with those produced from glucose and from cheese whey

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Exopolysaccharide production is required for development of Escherichia coli K-12 biofilm architecture.

Authors:  P N Danese; L A Pratt; R Kolter
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Genetic analysis of biodegradation of tetralin by a Sphingomonas strain.

Authors:  M J Hernáez; W Reineke; E Santero
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm.

Authors:  D G Davies; M R Parsek; J P Pearson; B H Iglewski; J W Costerton; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Individual-based modelling of biofilms.

Authors:  J U Kreft; C Picioreanu; J W Wimpenny; M C van Loosdrecht
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.777

View more
  7 in total

1.  Spatial expression of a mercury-inducible green fluorescent protein within a nanoporous latex-based biosensor coating.

Authors:  Janet L Schottel; Paul M Orwin; C Ron Anderson; Michael C Flickinger
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  A novel planar flow cell for studies of biofilm heterogeneity and flow-biofilm interactions.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Tadas S Sileika; Cheng Chen; Yang Liu; Jisun Lee; Aaron I Packman
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Molecular characterization of the bacterial communities in the different compartments of a full-scale reverse-osmosis water purification plant.

Authors:  L A Bereschenko; G H J Heilig; M M Nederlof; M C M van Loosdrecht; A J M Stams; G J W Euverink
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Toward automated analysis of biofilm architecture: bias caused by extraneous confocal laser scanning microscopy images.

Authors:  Robin T Merod; Jennifer E Warren; Hope McCaslin; Stefan Wuertz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges.

Authors:  Brandon W Peterson; Yan He; Yijin Ren; Aidan Zerdoum; Matthew R Libera; Prashant K Sharma; Arie-Jan van Winkelhoff; Danielle Neut; Paul Stoodley; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 16.408

6.  Ecological strategies and metabolic trade-offs of complex environmental biofilms.

Authors:  Robert Niederdorfer; Katharina Besemer; Tom J Battin; Hannes Peter
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 7.290

7.  Extremophilic microbial communities on photovoltaic panel surfaces: a two-year study.

Authors:  Kristie Tanner; Esther Molina-Menor; Adriel Latorre-Pérez; Àngela Vidal-Verdú; Cristina Vilanova; Juli Peretó; Manuel Porcar
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.813

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.