BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) is overexpressed frequently in aerodigestive tumors, especially in colorectal tumors. Therefore, it may be a suitable biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We performed a pilot study of whether detecting COX-2 expression in fecal RNA enables us to discriminate between patients with and without CRC. METHODS: The study cohort included 29 patients with CRC, and 22 control patients without neoplastic disease of the colon or rectum. RNA was isolated from routinely collected stool samples using a modified method. The expression levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and COX-2 were determined by nested reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: The sensitivity and the specificity of fecal COX-2 assay for CRC were 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-98%) and 100% (95% CI, 85%-100%), respectively, whereas those of the fecal CEA assay for CRC were 100% (95% CI, 88%-100%) and 5% (95% CI, 2%-23%), respectively. COX-2 messenger RNA (mRNA) was detected in 3 of 4 patients with Dukes' stage A, 13 of 14 patients with Dukes' stage B, and 10 of 11 patients with Dukes' stage C or D. COX-2 mRNA was detected in 5 of 7 patients with proximal cancer and in 21 of 22 patients with distal cancer. The COX-2 assay was superior to the CEA assay for detecting CRC in terms of specificity, although both assays had high sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: This fecal COX-2 assay had high sensitivity and high specificity for detecting CRC. These results suggest that it would be a promising approach for detecting CRC, although a larger study is necessary to assess the sensitivity and the specificity.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) is overexpressed frequently in aerodigestive tumors, especially in colorectal tumors. Therefore, it may be a suitable biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We performed a pilot study of whether detecting COX-2 expression in fecal RNA enables us to discriminate between patients with and without CRC. METHODS: The study cohort included 29 patients with CRC, and 22 control patients without neoplastic disease of the colon or rectum. RNA was isolated from routinely collected stool samples using a modified method. The expression levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and COX-2 were determined by nested reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: The sensitivity and the specificity of fecal COX-2 assay for CRC were 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-98%) and 100% (95% CI, 85%-100%), respectively, whereas those of the fecal CEA assay for CRC were 100% (95% CI, 88%-100%) and 5% (95% CI, 2%-23%), respectively. COX-2 messenger RNA (mRNA) was detected in 3 of 4 patients with Dukes' stage A, 13 of 14 patients with Dukes' stage B, and 10 of 11 patients with Dukes' stage C or D. COX-2 mRNA was detected in 5 of 7 patients with proximal cancer and in 21 of 22 patients with distal cancer. The COX-2 assay was superior to the CEA assay for detecting CRC in terms of specificity, although both assays had high sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: This fecal COX-2 assay had high sensitivity and high specificity for detecting CRC. These results suggest that it would be a promising approach for detecting CRC, although a larger study is necessary to assess the sensitivity and the specificity.
Authors: Yuyi Wang; Chi Du; Nan Zhang; Mei Li; Yanyang Liu; Maoyuan Zhao; Feng Wang; Feng Luo Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Nysia I George; Joanne R Lupton; Nancy D Turner; Robert S Chapkin; Laurie A Davidson; Naisyin Wang Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 3.169