Literature DB >> 15297091

Value of body mass index in the detection of severe malnutrition: influence of the pathology and changes in anthropometric parameters.

B Campillo1, E Paillaud, I Uzan, I Merlier, M Abdellaoui, J Perennec, F Louarn, P N Bories.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We have estimated the prevalence of severe malnutrition in groups of patients hospitalized for different medical causes and assessed the sensitivity of BMI in the diagnosis of severe malnutrition.
DESIGN: A prospective study enrolled 1052 patients: 396 patients with liver cirrhosis including 165 non-ascitic patients (NAP), 124 patients with mild ascites (MAP), 107 patients with tense ascites (TAP), 251 patients after cardiac surgery (SCP), 81 patients with cardiac diseases (MCP), 85 patients with stroke (SP), 36 patients with degenerative neurological diseases (DNP), 68 patients after surgery of a hip fracture (HFP), 91 patients with palliative care for cancer (CP) and 44 elderly patients with medical affections (EP). BMI, mid-arm muscular circumference (MAMC) and triceps skinfold thickness (TST) were measured within 48 h after admission. Patients with MAMC and TST below the 5th percentile of a reference population when aged < or = 74 or the 10th percentile when aged > or = 75 were defined as severely malnourished. Sensitivity of BMI < 20 to detect malnutrition was assessed.
RESULTS: The prevalence of severe malnutrition was the highest in TAP (39.1%) HFP (25.6%) and MAP (24.3%) and the lowest in SCP (4%), SP (4.8%), DNP (5.7%) and MCP (7.4%) (P < 10(-4)). In multivariate analysis, low TST was associated with female gender (P < 10(-4)) mild and tense ascites (P = 0.038, P = 0.0004), low MAMC with male gender (P < 10(-4)), low BMI with female gender (P = 0.0082), hip fracture (P = 0.0407) and cancer (P = 0.0059). The sensitivity of BMI to detect severe malnutrition was the highest in HFP, CP and EP (100%, 80% and 100% respectively) and the lowest in TAP, MCP and SP (40%, 33.3% and 50% respectively). After exclusion of TAP, sensitivity of BMI to detect malnutrition correlated significantly with the coefficient of correlation between MAMC and TST observed in each group (r = 0.821, P = 0.0066).
CONCLUSION: Ascitic cirrhotic patients and elderly patients after surgery of hip fracture had the highest prevalence of severe malnutrition. BMI had the highest sensitivity when both TST and MAMC were damaged to the same extent. BMI < 20 has a high sensitivity in the diagnosis of severe malnutrition in elderly and cancer patients but not in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites, cardiovascular and neurological patients. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15297091     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2003.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0261-5614            Impact factor:   7.324


  17 in total

1.  [Management of malnutrition in geriatric hospital units in Germany].

Authors:  C Smoliner; D Volkert; R Wirth
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  Surgery and perioperative management for post-intubation tracheoesophageal fistula: case series analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Puma; Jacopo Vannucci; Stefano Santoprete; Moira Urbani; Lucio Cagini; Marco Andolfi; Rossella Potenza; Niccolò Daddi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Malnutrition Screening and Assessment in Hospitalised Older People: a Review.

Authors:  E Dent; E O Hoogendijk; R Visvanathan; O R L Wright
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Concurrent and predictive evaluation of malnutrition diagnostic measures in hip fracture inpatients: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  J J Bell; J D Bauer; S Capra; R C Pulle
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Pretreatment weight status and weight loss among head and neck cancer patients receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy: implications for nutrition integrated treatment pathways.

Authors:  Mary E Platek; Elizabeth Myrick; Susan A McCloskey; Vishal Gupta; Mary E Reid; Gregory E Wilding; David Cohan; Hassan Arshad; Nestor R Rigual; Wesley L Hicks; Maureen Sullivan; Graham W Warren; Anurag K Singh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Female gender in the setting of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Kryssia Isabel Rodríguez-Castro; Eleonora De Martin; Martina Gambato; Silvia Lazzaro; Erica Villa; Patrizia Burra
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-12-24

7.  The SNAQ(RC), an easy traffic light system as a first step in the recognition of undernutrition in residential care.

Authors:  H M Kruizenga; H C W de Vet; C M E Van Marissing; E E P M Stassen; J E Strijk; M A E Van Bokhorst-de Van der Schueren; J C H Horman; J M G A Schols; J J Van Binsbergen; A Eliens; D L Knol; M Visser
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.075

8.  Comparison of the prevalence of malnutrition diagnosis in head and neck, gastrointestinal, and lung cancer patients by 3 classification methods.

Authors:  Mary E Platek; Johann V Popp; Candi S Possinger; Carol A Denysschen; Peter Horvath; Jean K Brown
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.592

9.  Body mass index and disease burden in elderly men and women: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Jan-Magnus Kvamme; Tom Wilsgaard; Jon Florholmen; Bjarne K Jacobsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 10.  Sarcopenia from mechanism to diagnosis and treatment in liver disease.

Authors:  Srinivasan Dasarathy; Manuela Merli
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 25.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.