Literature DB >> 15296739

Systematic analysis of added-value in simple comparative models of protein structure.

Suvobrata Chakravarty1, Roberto Sanchez.   

Abstract

Added-value is the additional information that a model carries with respect to the template structure used for model building. Thousands of single-template models, corresponding to proteins of known structure, were analyzed. The accuracy of structure-derived properties, such as residue accessibility, surface area, electrostatic potential, and others, was determined as a function of template:target sequence identity by comparing the models with their corresponding experimental structures. Added-value was determined by comparing the accuracy in models with that from templates. Geometry-dependent properties such as neighborhood of buried residues and accessible surface area showed low added-value. Properties that also depend on the protein sequence, such as presence of polar areas and electrostatic potential, showed high added-value. In general added-value increases when template:target sequence identity decreases, but it is also affected by alignment errors. This study justifies the use of models instead of the use of templates to estimate structure-derived properties of a target protein.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15296739     DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2004.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  8 in total

1.  Prediction of protease substrates using sequence and structure features.

Authors:  David T Barkan; Daniel R Hostetter; Sami Mahrus; Ursula Pieper; James A Wells; Charles S Craik; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Contributions to the NIH-NIGMS Protein Structure Initiative from the PSI Production Centers.

Authors:  Stephen K Burley; Andrzej Joachimiak; Gaetano T Montelione; Ian A Wilson
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  How well can the accuracy of comparative protein structure models be predicted?

Authors:  David Eramian; Narayanan Eswar; Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Systematic assessment of accuracy of comparative model of proteins belonging to different structural fold classes.

Authors:  Suvobrata Chakravarty; Dario Ghersi; Roberto Sanchez
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Accuracy of structure-derived properties in simple comparative models of protein structures.

Authors:  Suvobrata Chakravarty; Lei Wang; Roberto Sanchez
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Electrostatic and functional analysis of the seven-bladed WD beta-propellers.

Authors:  Najl V Valeyev; A Kristina Downing; John Sondek; Charlotte Deane
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 1.625

7.  Preservation of protein clefts in comparative models.

Authors:  David Piedra; Sergi Lois; Xavier de la Cruz
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2008-01-16

8.  Systematic analysis of the effect of multiple templates on the accuracy of comparative models of protein structure.

Authors:  Suvobrata Chakravarty; Sucheta Godbole; Bing Zhang; Seth Berger; Roberto Sanchez
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2008-07-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.