OBJECTIVE: To simultaneously evaluate personal, medical, and job factors that could affect recovery from work-related, low back disorders, specifically focusing on an active working sample. DESIGN: Observational, longitudinal study. SETTING: Two US automotive plants. PARTICIPANTS: Employees (N=352; 289 men, 63 women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 45.1+/-7.5 y) who were active hourly autoworkers, diagnosed with work-related, low back disorder by the plant's medical department. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Oswestry Disability Questionnaire for back pain was used to evaluate recovery. RESULTS: Factors associated with better recovery were lower stress levels (P<.001) and exercise or physical activity outside work (P<.001); factors associated with higher disability levels over time were current cigarette smoking (P<.01) and bedrest (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Personal modifiable factors are major influences in the recovery from work-related, low back disorders, even in active working populations. Interventions aimed at increasing exercise and decreasing stress should also be considered as a part of rehabilitation in employed persons with low levels of disability.
OBJECTIVE: To simultaneously evaluate personal, medical, and job factors that could affect recovery from work-related, low back disorders, specifically focusing on an active working sample. DESIGN: Observational, longitudinal study. SETTING: Two US automotive plants. PARTICIPANTS: Employees (N=352; 289 men, 63 women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 45.1+/-7.5 y) who were active hourly autoworkers, diagnosed with work-related, low back disorder by the plant's medical department. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Oswestry Disability Questionnaire for back pain was used to evaluate recovery. RESULTS: Factors associated with better recovery were lower stress levels (P<.001) and exercise or physical activity outside work (P<.001); factors associated with higher disability levels over time were current cigarette smoking (P<.01) and bedrest (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Personal modifiable factors are major influences in the recovery from work-related, low back disorders, even in active working populations. Interventions aimed at increasing exercise and decreasing stress should also be considered as a part of rehabilitation in employed persons with low levels of disability.
Authors: Michael J Zvolensky; Lorra Garey; Nubia A Mayorga; Andrew H Rogers; Michael F Orr; Joseph W Ditre; Natalia Peraza Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2018-11-28
Authors: Daniel J Paulus; Lorra Garey; Matthew W Gallagher; Jaye L Derrick; Charles Jardin; Kirsten Langdon; Joseph W Ditre; Michael J Zvolensky Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Steven J Kamper; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Mark J Hancock; Julia M Hush; Robert J Smeets Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2010-03-13 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Anne M Stoddard; Sonja Stoffel; Orfeu Buxton; Grace Sembajwe; Dean Hashimoto; Jack T Dennerlein; Karen Hopcia Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Caitlin Eicher Caspi; Jack T Dennerlein; Christopher Kenwood; Anne M Stoddard; Karen Hopcia; Dean Hashimoto; Glorian Sorensen Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.162