Literature DB >> 15295659

Comparison of electrical stimulation thresholds in normal and retinal degenerated mouse retina.

Satoshi Suzuki1, Mark S Humayun, James D Weiland, Shih-Jen Chen, Eyal Margalit, Duke V Piyathaisere, Eugene de Juan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the threshold for electrically elicited action potentials of retinal ganglion cells in normal mouse retina and photoreceptor degenerated (rd) mouse retina.
METHODS: Microelectrode recordings were made from retinal ganglion cells of normal and rd mice. Mice with a genetically based retinal degeneration (rd mice) were grown to the age of 16 weeks, when light-evoked responses could no longer be recorded. A bare wire was placed in the vitreous to stimulate the retina with charge-balanced current pulses. The following pulse shapes were investigated: single, square biphasic pulse, single sine wave, and biphasic pulse trains.
RESULTS: Normal mice had significantly lower stimulus thresholds than rd mice for all pulse shapes. In normal and rd mice, short pulses were more efficient with respect to total charge used, but required a higher current. In normal mice, sine wave stimulation was significantly more efficient than a biphasic pulse of the same duration. No difference was noted between sine wave and square wave stimulation in rd mice. Pulse trains offered little benefit over single pulses.
CONCLUSION: The amount of electrical charge required to elicit an action potential is dependent on the condition of the retina and the shape of the stimulus pulse used to deliver the charge. Copyright Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15295659     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-004-0084-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  18 in total

1.  Chronic intravitreous infusion of ciliary neurotrophic factor modulates electrical retinal stimulation thresholds in the RCS rat.

Authors:  Tiffany L Kent; Inna V Glybina; Gary W Abrams; Raymond Iezzi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The dependence of spectral impedance on disc microelectrode radius.

Authors:  Ashish K Ahuja; Matthew R Behrend; John J Whalen; Marks S Humayun; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Stimulation strategies for selective activation of retinal ganglion cell soma and threshold reduction.

Authors:  Yao-Chuan Chang; Dorsa Haji Ghaffari; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Simultaneous recording of mouse retinal ganglion cells during epiretinal or subretinal stimulation.

Authors:  S L Sim; R J Szalewski; L J Johnson; L E Akah; L E Shoemaker; W B Thoreson; E Margalit
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Undersized dendritic arborizations in retinal ganglion cells of the rd1 mutant mouse: a paradigm of early onset photoreceptor degeneration.

Authors:  Devid Damiani; Elena Novelli; Francesca Mazzoni; Enrica Strettoi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Increasing Electrical Stimulation Efficacy in Degenerated Retina: Stimulus Waveform Design in a Multiscale Computational Model.

Authors:  Kyle Loizos; Robert Marc; Mark Humayun; James R Anderson; Bryan W Jones; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Focal electrical stimulation of major ganglion cell types in the primate retina for the design of visual prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Electronic approaches to restoration of sight.

Authors:  G A Goetz; D V Palanker
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2016-08-09

10.  A comparison of optical and electrophysiological methods for recording retinal ganglion cells during electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Jianmin Luo; Bronson J Boosalis; Wallace B Thoreson; Eyal Margalit
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.424

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.