STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: For implant-supported prostheses, passive fit is critical for the success of rehabilitation, especially when alternative materials are used. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare interfacial fit of implant-supported prostheses cast in titanium to those cast in gold alloy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five 3-unit fixed partial dentures were fabricated in gold alloy (Degudent U) as 1-piece castings, and 5 others were similarly cast in commercially pure titanium (Grade 1). The interfacial gaps between the prostheses and the abutments were evaluated with an optical microscope, before and after electroerosion. Readings were made with both screws tightened (10 N.cm torque), and with only 1 side tightened, so as to also evaluate the passive fit of the prostheses. Data were compared statistically by 2-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey multiple range test (alpha=.05). RESULTS: Before electroerosion, the interfacial gaps for the 1-piece prostheses were significantly smaller (P<.001) in the gold alloy group when the screws were tightened (Au=12.6 +/- 3.0 microm, compared to Ti=30.1 +/- 6.4 microm). When the side opposite the tightened side was analyzed, there was no significant difference between the gold alloy and titanium groups (Au=69.2 +/- 24.9 microm and Ti=94.2 +/- 39.6 microm). The electroerosion procedure significantly (P<.001) reduced the gaps at the interfaces for both groups under all conditions. Comparison between groups after electroerosion did not present significant differences when the side opposite the tightened side was analyzed, but the gold alloy group showed better fit when the tightened side was analyzed (12.8 +/- 1.4 microm for gold alloy; 29.6 +/- 4.4 microm for titanium) and when both screws were tightened (5.4 +/- 2.3 microm for gold alloy; 16.1 +/- 5.5 microm for titanium). CONCLUSIONS: Cast titanium prostheses, despite showing larger interfacial gaps between the prosthesis and abutment than those obtained with gold alloy, had improved fit after being subjected to electroerosion.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: For implant-supported prostheses, passive fit is critical for the success of rehabilitation, especially when alternative materials are used. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare interfacial fit of implant-supported prostheses cast in titanium to those cast in gold alloy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five 3-unit fixed partial dentures were fabricated in gold alloy (Degudent U) as 1-piece castings, and 5 others were similarly cast in commercially pure titanium (Grade 1). The interfacial gaps between the prostheses and the abutments were evaluated with an optical microscope, before and after electroerosion. Readings were made with both screws tightened (10 N.cm torque), and with only 1 side tightened, so as to also evaluate the passive fit of the prostheses. Data were compared statistically by 2-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey multiple range test (alpha=.05). RESULTS: Before electroerosion, the interfacial gaps for the 1-piece prostheses were significantly smaller (P<.001) in the gold alloy group when the screws were tightened (Au=12.6 +/- 3.0 microm, compared to Ti=30.1 +/- 6.4 microm). When the side opposite the tightened side was analyzed, there was no significant difference between the gold alloy and titanium groups (Au=69.2 +/- 24.9 microm and Ti=94.2 +/- 39.6 microm). The electroerosion procedure significantly (P<.001) reduced the gaps at the interfaces for both groups under all conditions. Comparison between groups after electroerosion did not present significant differences when the side opposite the tightened side was analyzed, but the gold alloy group showed better fit when the tightened side was analyzed (12.8 +/- 1.4 microm for gold alloy; 29.6 +/- 4.4 microm for titanium) and when both screws were tightened (5.4 +/- 2.3 microm for gold alloy; 16.1 +/- 5.5 microm for titanium). CONCLUSIONS: Cast titanium prostheses, despite showing larger interfacial gaps between the prosthesis and abutment than those obtained with gold alloy, had improved fit after being subjected to electroerosion.
Authors: Spiros Zinelis; Youssef S Al Jabbari; Andrew Thomas; Nick Silikas; George Eliades Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2013-03-17 Impact factor: 3.573