Literature DB >> 15294203

Response monitoring without sensory feedback.

S Allain1, T Hasbroucq, B Burle, J Grapperon, F Vidal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The elicitation of an evoked potential, the 'error negativity' (Ne) when subjects commit errors in speeded tasks, is often taken as an index of response monitoring processes. The presence of a Ne-like wave on purely correct trials challenges the current conceptions about the nature of such a monitoring system. Here, we evaluate the possibility that the Ne-like wave on correct trials is merely due to reafferences, and at the same time, we test directly the general opinion according to which the Ne is generated by an internal signal.
METHODS: We studied the presence of a Ne-like wave in a completely deafferented patient. The patient performed two reaction time (RT) tasks: a two-responses RT task and a go/no-go task.
RESULTS: In this patient, a Ne occurs on errors, on incorrect EMG activations, and on purely correct responses. On errors, the Ne was clearly followed by an error positivity (Pe).
CONCLUSIONS: The Ne and the Ne-like wave are not generated by reafferences. This similarity is a further argument to consider that these two waves are of same nature. SIGNIFICANCE: The present data demonstrate that sensory information is not mandatory for the brain to monitor and correct ongoing responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15294203     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  11 in total

1.  Pre-output Language Monitoring in Sign Production.

Authors:  Stephanie K Riès; Linda Nadalet; Soren Mickelsen; Megan Mott; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  On the Comparison Between the Nc/CRN and the Ne/ERN.

Authors:  Franck Vidal; Boris Burle; Thierry Hasbroucq
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 3.  Conscious perception of errors and its relation to the anterior insula.

Authors:  Markus Ullsperger; Helga A Harsay; Jan R Wessel; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 4.  Generator localization by current source density (CSD): implications of volume conduction and field closure at intracranial and scalp resolutions.

Authors:  Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Differential effects of motor efference copies and proprioceptive information on response evaluation processes.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Stock; Edmund Wascher; Christian Beste
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Is there any electrophysiological evidence for subliminal error processing?

Authors:  Shani Shalgi; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Altered error processing following vascular thalamic damage: evidence from an antisaccade task.

Authors:  Jutta Peterburs; Giulio Pergola; Benno Koch; Michael Schwarz; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; Irene Daum; Christian Bellebaum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dissociation of response and feedback negativity in schizophrenia: electrophysiological and computational evidence for a deficit in the representation of value.

Authors:  Sarah E Morris; Clay B Holroyd; Monica C Mann-Wrobel; James M Gold
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Effects of response force parameters on medial-frontal negativity.

Authors:  Anne-Simone Armbrecht; Henning Gibbons; Jutta Stahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Lateralization of spatial information processing in response monitoring.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Stock; Christian Beste
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.