Literature DB >> 15293298

Role of sonography in diagnosing and staging invasive lobular carcinoma.

Veronica L Selinko1, Lavinia P Middleton, Peter J Dempsey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare the sensitivity of sonography with that of mammography in the detection of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), to identify ILC's typical imaging characteristics, and to further show the important role of ultrasound in the staging and treatment planning of this elusive tumor.
METHODS: We identified all patients with ILC seen at our institution from 1998 through 2001; 62 had pathologically proven pure ILC. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the sonographic appearances in correlation with mammographic, pathologic, and clinical findings. We reviewed the results of sonographic examinations of the nodal basins and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of suspicious nodes and correlated them with initial clinical and final pathologic staging. We noted all cases of multicentricity or multifocality and analyzed the relative sensitivity of mammography and sonography according to tumor size.
RESULTS: Sonography had a sensitivity of 98% versus 65% for mammography. The most common mammographic pattern was a spiculated mass or architectural distortion (39%). On sonography the most common pattern was a hypoechoic mass with (58%) or without (27%) shadowing. An infiltrative pattern was observed in 13% of the cases. Ultrasound-guided FNA confirmed disease was present in the axillary lymph nodes in 21% of the patients, and sonographic examination of the nodal basins resulted in a change of clinical staging from N0 to N1 in 75% and from N1 to N0 in 30% of the cases. Multicentricity/multifocality was identified sonographically and proved by FNA in 21% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Sonography has a much higher sensitivity than mammography in detecting ILC and therefore is an important adjunctive tool in the diagnosis of this form of cancer. Routine examination of node-bearing areas in patients with ILC proved useful in refining the disease staging. Copyright 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15293298     DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound        ISSN: 0091-2751            Impact factor:   0.910


  19 in total

1.  Imaging features of invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Sung Hun Kim; Eun Suk Cha; Chang Suk Park; Bong Joo Kang; In Yong Whang; A Won Lee; Byung Joo Song; Jeongmi Park
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  CDH1 germline mutations and hereditary lobular breast cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni Corso; Mattia Intra; Chiara Trentin; Paolo Veronesi; Viviana Galimberti
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Treatment trends in early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  S Eva Singletary; Lina Patel-Parekh; Kirby I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The relationship between hormone therapy use at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer and tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Mary Panjari; Robin Bell; Marijana Lijovic; Maria La China; Max Schwarz; Pamela Fradkin; Jo Bradbury; Helen Farrugia; Susan R Davis
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.869

5.  Imaging features and conspicuity of invasive lobular carcinomas on digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Foucauld Chamming's; Ellen Kao; Ann Aldis; Romuald Ferré; Atilla Omeroglu; Caroline Reinhold; Benoit Mesurolle
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Factors Affecting Concordance between Radiological and Histological Findings in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma - Experience from a National Cancer Centre.

Authors:  Duaa Abu-Sinn; Donal O'Driscoll; Maurice Murphy
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Sonomammographic characteristics of invasive lobular carcinoma.

Authors:  Osama R Kombar; Dalia M Fahmy; Mary V Brown; Omar Farouk; Osama El-Damshety
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2012-07-30

Review 8.  Radiological-pathological correlation in diagnosing breast carcinoma: the role of pathology in the multimodality era.

Authors:  Tibor Tot; Maria Gere
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A literature review and future perspectives.

Authors:  Gisela Lg Menezes; Floor M Knuttel; Bertine L Stehouwer; Ruud M Pijnappel; Maurice Aaj van den Bosch
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10

10.  Incremental Cancer Detection of Locoregional Restaging with Diagnostic Mammography Combined with Whole-Breast and Regional Nodal Ultrasound in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Rosalind P Candelaria; Monica L Huang; Beatriz E Adrada; Roland Bassett; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer; Benjamin D Smith; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Wei Tse Yang
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.