Literature DB >> 18521722

Radiological-pathological correlation in diagnosing breast carcinoma: the role of pathology in the multimodality era.

Tibor Tot1, Maria Gere.   

Abstract

Breast carcinoma is a lobar disease, as the simultaneously or asynchronously appearing often multiple tumor foci originate from a single sick breast lobe. In its initial phase, the spatial pattern of malignant transformation may be lobar (targeting the entire lobe), segmental (targeting a segment) or terminal (targeting distant terminal ductal-lobular units) within the sick lobe. All these variations are properly characterized by the following parameters: the extent of the disease (the volume of the tissue containing all the actually present malignant structures within the breast), the distribution of the lesions within this tissue (unifocal, multifocal or diffuse, separately for in situ and invasive component), the size of the tumor (corresponding to the largest diameter of the largest invasive focus) and the exact localization of the lesion(s). In addition, intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity have to be noticed, if evident. Combining the results of different imaging modalities (mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging) the radiologist may compensate the limitations of individual methods. This multimodality approach leads to more accurate radiological size measurement, more accurate assessment of the distribution of the lesions and disease extent. This represents a challenge for pathologists as the traditional histopathology method based on fragmentation and sampling of macroscopically suspicious lesion(s) is clearly insufficient for modern postoperative radiological-pathological correlation. There is a clear need for more complete examination of the excised tissue and for a three-dimensional reconstruction of the finding, preferably using continuous large tissue slices and two and three-dimensional large-format histological sections. Discordant results may still appear as a consequence of failure in radiological-pathological correlation or related to certain tumor subtypes as invasive lobular carcinoma of diffuse type, low grade in situ lesions or micropapillary ductal in situ carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18521722     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-008-9061-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  26 in total

Review 1.  The pressing need for better histologic-mammographic correlation of the many variations in normal breast anatomy.

Authors:  T Tot; L Tabár; P B Dean
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma.

Authors:  S P Weinstein; S G Orel; R Heller; C Reynolds; B Czerniecki; L J Solin; M Schnall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma.

Authors:  P Skaane; F Skjørten
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Nipple involvement and multicentricity in breast cancer. A study on whole organ sections.

Authors:  J Lüttges; H Kalbfleisch; P Prinz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  The limited prognostic value of measuring and grading small invasive breast carcinomas: the whole sick lobe versus the details within it.

Authors:  Tibor Tot
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2006-07-12

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Lorena Gutierrez; Moriel S NessAiver; W Bradford Carter; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca S Lewis; Olga B Ioffe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  A comparison of large block macrosectioning and conventional techniques in breast pathology.

Authors:  P A Jackson; W Merchant; C J McCormick; M G Cook
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Clinical relevance of the distribution of the lesions in 500 consecutive breast cancer cases documented in large-format histologic sections.

Authors:  Tibor Tot
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Extent, distribution, and mammographic/histological correlations of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  R Holland; J H Hendriks; A L Vebeek; M Mravunac; J H Schuurmans Stekhoven
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-03-03       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Human breast duct anatomy, the 'sick lobe' hypothesis and intraductal approaches to breast cancer.

Authors:  James J Going; Timothy J Mohun
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  7 in total

1.  Which factors influence MRI-pathology concordance of tumour size measurements in breast cancer?

Authors:  M Rominger; D Berg; T Frauenfelder; A Ramaswamy; N Timmesfeld
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  The role of radiological-pathological correlation in diagnosing early breast cancer: the pathologist's perspective.

Authors:  Tibor Tot; László Tabár
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Image-guided breast biopsy and localisation: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Ulrich Bick; Rubina M Trimboli; Alexandra Athanasiou; Corinne Balleyguier; Pascal A T Baltzer; Maria Bernathova; Krisztina Borbély; Boris Brkljacic; Luca A Carbonaro; Paola Clauser; Enrico Cassano; Catherine Colin; Gul Esen; Andrew Evans; Eva M Fallenberg; Michael H Fuchsjaeger; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas H Helbich; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Michel Herranz; Karen Kinkel; Fleur Kilburn-Toppin; Christiane K Kuhl; Mihai Lesaru; Marc B I Lobbes; Ritse M Mann; Laura Martincich; Pietro Panizza; Federica Pediconi; Ruud M Pijnappel; Katja Pinker; Simone Schiaffino; Tamar Sella; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Anne Tardivon; Chantal Van Ongeval; Matthew G Wallis; Sophia Zackrisson; Gabor Forrai; Julia Camps Herrero; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-02-05

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery: results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA).

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Rubina M Trimboli; Nehmat Houssami; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas H Helbich; Marina Álvarez Benito; Corinne Balleyguier; Massimo Bazzocchi; Peter Bult; Massimo Calabrese; Julia Camps Herrero; Francesco Cartia; Enrico Cassano; Paola Clauser; Andrea Cozzi; Danúbia A de Andrade; Marcos F de Lima Docema; Catherine Depretto; Valeria Dominelli; Gábor Forrai; Rossano Girometti; Steven E Harms; Sarah Hilborne; Raffaele Ienzi; Marc B I Lobbes; Claudio Losio; Ritse M Mann; Stefania Montemezzi; Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Umit A Ozcan; Federica Pediconi; Katja Pinker; Heike Preibsch; José L Raya Povedano; Daniela Sacchetto; Gianfranco P Scaperrotta; Simone Schiaffino; Margrethe Schlooz; Botond K Szabó; Donna B Taylor; Özden S Ulus; Mireille Van Goethem; Jeroen Veltman; Stefanie Weigel; Evelyn Wenkel; Chiara Zuiani; Giovanni Di Leo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Stereotactic breast biopsy: A review & applicability in the Indian context.

Authors:  Suma Chakrabarthi
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

6.  The role of large-format histopathology in assessing subgross morphological prognostic parameters: a single institution report of 1000 consecutive breast cancer cases.

Authors:  Tibor Tot
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-10-21

7.  Agreement between dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic tumour size of breast cancer and analysis of the correlation with BI-RADS descriptors.

Authors:  Aysegul Akdogan Gemici; Ercan Inci
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.