Literature DB >> 15288532

Man-made mineral (vitreous) fibres: evaluations of cancer hazards by the IARC Monographs Programme.

Robert A Baan1, Yann Grosse.   

Abstract

Man-made vitreous (glass-like) fibres are non-crystalline, fibrous inorganic substances (silicates) made primarily from rock, slag, glass or other processed minerals. These materials, also called man-made mineral fibres, include glass fibres (used in glass wool and continuous glass filament), rock or stone wool, slag wool and refractory ceramic fibres. They are widely used for thermal and acoustical insulation and to a lesser extent for other purposes. These products are potentially hazardous to human health because they release airborne respirable fibres during their production, use and removal. Man-made mineral fibres and man-made vitreous fibres have been the subject of reviews by IARC Monographs Working Groups in 1987 and 2001, respectively, which resulted in evaluations of the carcinogenic hazard to humans from exposure to these materials. These reviews and evaluations have been published as Volumes 43 and 81 of the IARC Monographs series [IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, vol. 43, Man-made Mineral Fibres and Radon (1988); IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, vol. 81, Man-made Vitreous Fibres (2002)]. The re-evaluation in 2001 was undertaken because there have been substantial improvements in the quality of the epidemiological information available on the carcinogenicity to humans of glass fibres, continuous glass filament and rock/slag wool. The new evaluations have addressed the limitations of earlier cohort studies, particularly concerning the lack of adjustment with respect to concomitant risk factors such as smoking and other sources of occupational exposure. In addition, the evaluation of the evidence for carcinogenicity of glass fibres to experimental animals has been refined, by making a distinction between insulation glass wool and special-purpose glass fibres. The results of the evaluations in 1987 and 2001 are thus different in several aspects. In this paper, the reviews and evaluations of the carcinogenic hazards of exposure to man-made mineral fibres (MMMF, Monograph volume 43, [1]) and man-made vitreous fibres (MMVF, Monograph volume 81, [2]) are summarised, and the differences explained. In particular, the considerations of the respective IARC Monographs Working Groups (1987, 2001) in reaching their conclusions are discussed in some detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15288532     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  9 in total

1.  Probabilistic risk assessment (Monte Carlo simulation method) of Pb and Cd in the onion bulb (Allium cepa) and soil of Iran.

Authors:  Yadolah Fakhri; Amin Mousavi Khaneghah; Gea Oliveri Conti; Margherita Ferrante; Azimeh Khezri; Alireza Darvishi; Mehrdad Ahmadi; Vajihe Hasanzadeh; Aziz Rahimizadeh; Hassan Keramati; Bigard Moradi; Nazak Amanidaz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Role of mutagenicity in asbestos fiber-induced carcinogenicity and other diseases.

Authors:  Sarah X L Huang; Marie-Claude Jaurand; David W Kamp; John Whysner; Tom K Hei
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

3.  Vitamin C levels in blood are influenced by polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferases.

Authors:  Alexandra Horska; Csilla Mislanova; Stefano Bonassi; Marcello Ceppi; Katarina Volkovova; Maria Dusinska
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Case report: analytical electron microscopy of lung granulomas associated with exposure to coating materials carried by glass wool fibers.

Authors:  Angela S Ferreira; Valéria B Moreira; Marcos César S Castro; Porfírio J Soares; Eduardo Algranti; Leonardo R Andrade
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Indoor radon exposure and lung cancer: a review of ecological studies.

Authors:  Ji Young Yoon; Jung-Dong Lee; So Won Joo; Dae Ryong Kang
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-03-25

Review 6.  Nanomaterials: certain aspects of application, risk assessment and risk communication.

Authors:  Peter Laux; Jutta Tentschert; Christian Riebeling; Albert Braeuning; Otto Creutzenberg; Astrid Epp; Valérie Fessard; Karl-Heinz Haas; Andrea Haase; Kerstin Hund-Rinke; Norbert Jakubowski; Peter Kearns; Alfonso Lampen; Hubert Rauscher; Reinhilde Schoonjans; Angela Störmer; Axel Thielmann; Uwe Mühle; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Composition, Respirable Fraction and Dissolution Rate of 24 Stone Wool MMVF with their Binder.

Authors:  Wendel Wohlleben; Hubert Waindok; Björn Daumann; Kai Werle; Melanie Drum; Heiko Egenolf
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 8.  History of breast implants: Back to the future.

Authors:  Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo; Guido Paolini; Guido Firmani; Michail Sorotos
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2022-03-11

9.  Radon in Schools: A Review of Radon Testing Efforts in Canadian Schools.

Authors:  Sandy Shergill; Lindsay Forsman-Phillips; Anne-Marie Nicol
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.