Literature DB >> 15285700

The paclitaxel (TAXUS)-eluting stent: a review of its use in the management of de novo coronary artery lesions.

John Waugh1, Antona J Wagstaff.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The TAXUSExpress stent contains paclitaxel 1 microg/mm(2). On deployment, paclitaxel is slowly released into the intimal tissue of the coronary artery to prevent cell proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia. When deployed in patients with previously untreated coronary artery lesions, the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) effectively reduces the need for revascularization without increasing the risk of in-stent thrombosis. While long-term outcomes data and comparative efficacy and cost-benefit trials versus other drug-eluting stents are required, the PES appears to be an attractive alternative for the management of de novo coronary artery lesions. PHARMACOLOGIC PROPERTIES: The PES comprises a stainless steel stent coated with a non-erodible biocompatible polyolefin matrix containing paclitaxel 1 microg/mm(2). Paclitaxel dose dependently inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation at therapeutic concentrations as a result of binding to and stabilizing cellular microtubules. This prevents the cascade of events associated with obstructive in-stent neointimal hyperplasia. Paclitaxel was released in a controlled manner from the stent coating in in vitro studies. The higher release rate in the first 2 days after implantation (to reduce response to implantation injury) slows over the next 8-10 days. The drug is rapidly taken up by intimal cells with minimal dispersion in the plasma; it was not detected systemically after stent deployment in clinical trials. Paclitaxel is extensively bound to proteins (88-98%), and is principally metabolized in the liver, undergoing biliary clearance after systemic administration. THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY: The efficacy of the PES was compared with that of a bare-metal stent (BMS) in a number of randomized, double-blind, multicenter trials in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions. The TAXUS I and II trials used the NIR stent, while the pivotal TAXUS IV trial used the Express stent. The primary endpoints of the well designed TAXUS II and IV trials indicated superiority for the PES over the BMS. Twice as many patients receiving the BMS required target vessel revascularization at 9 months postprocedure and, 6 months following the procedure, the in-stent neointimal volume in the PES system was only one-third of that in the BMS. The incidence of cumulative major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, myocardial infarction [MI], or target vessel revascularization [TVR]) was also significantly lower in PES than BMS recipients at 9 and 12 months postprocedure. The incidence of cardiac death and MI was low and similar between treatment groups; however, TVR was significantly reduced by the PES versus the BMS. Other secondary endpoints, such as target lesion revascularization, luminal diameter stenosis, minimal luminal diameter, and serial intravascular ultrasound measurements from one or both trials supported these results. Preliminary analysis of the subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus in the TAXUS IV trial suggested that the PES was also effective in diabetic patients who receive oral medications. The group receiving insulin was too small to draw meaningful conclusions. TOLERABILITY: Because of the small paclitaxel dosages and the mainly local uptake, systemic adverse events associated with the PES are considered unlikely. The incidences of cardiac death and MI were very low and similar in both groups. Local events such as in-stent aneurysms, incomplete stent apposition, or in-stent thrombosis occurred at a similar rate in PES and BMS recipients. There has been no evidence of late thrombosis in PES recipients followed for 2 years. The rate of late luminal loss in the 5mm of vessel proximal and distal to the stent edges was significantly lower in PES than BMS systems. PHARMACOECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS: Initial deployment costs associated with the PES are likely to be offset by savings in repeat procedures, according to a cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK. Copyright 2004 Adis Data Information BV

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15285700     DOI: 10.2165/00129784-200404040-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs        ISSN: 1175-3277            Impact factor:   3.571


  8 in total

Review 1.  Vascular inflammation and repair: implications for re-endothelialization, restenosis, and stent thrombosis.

Authors:  Teruo Inoue; Kevin Croce; Toshifumi Morooka; Masashi Sakuma; Koichi Node; Daniel I Simon
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 2.  Update on paclitaxel for femoral-popliteal occlusive disease in the 15 months following a summary level meta-analysis demonstrated increased risk of late mortality and dose response to paclitaxel.

Authors:  Peter A Schneider; Ramon L Varcoe; Eric Secemsky; Marc Schermerhorn; Andrew Holden
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell galvanotactic response and differential migratory behavior.

Authors:  Kaitlyn R Ammann; Marvin J Slepian
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  INtimal hyPerplasia evAluated by oCT in de novo COROnary lesions treated by drug-eluting balloon and bare-metal stent (IN-PACT CORO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Francesco Burzotta; Marta Francesca Brancati; Carlo Trani; Italo Porto; Antonella Tommasino; Gianluigi De Maria; Giampaolo Niccoli; Antonio Maria Leone; Valentina Coluccia; Giovanni Schiavoni; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Drug-eluting stent: a review and update.

Authors:  Thein Htay; Ming W Liu
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2005

6.  The Control of Drug Release and Vascular Endothelialization after Hyaluronic Acid-Coated Paclitaxel Multi-Layer Coating Stent Implantation in Porcine Coronary Restenosis Model.

Authors:  In-Ho Bae; Myung Ho Jeong; Ju Han Kim; Yong Hwan Park; Kyung Seob Lim; Dae Sung Park; Jae Won Shim; Jung Ha Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Young Joon Hong; Doo Sun Sim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.243

7.  Poly(vinyl alcohol) Physical Hydrogels: Matrix-Mediated Drug Delivery Using Spontaneously Eroding Substrate.

Authors:  Bettina E B Jensen; Izaskun Dávila; Alexander N Zelikin
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Mortality is not associated with paclitaxel-coated devices usage in peripheral arterial disease of lower extremities.

Authors:  Dai Sik Ko; Gi Hwan Bae; Sang Tae Choi; Jaehun Jung; Jin Mo Kang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.