Literature DB >> 33347857

Vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell galvanotactic response and differential migratory behavior.

Kaitlyn R Ammann1, Marvin J Slepian2.   

Abstract

Chronic disease or injury of the vasculature impairs the functionality of vascular wall cells particularly in their ability to migrate and repair vascular surfaces. Under pathologic conditions, vascular endothelial cells (ECs) lose their non-thrombogenic properties and decrease their motility. Alternatively, vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) may increase motility and proliferation, leading to blood vessel luminal invasion. Current therapies to prevent subsequent blood vessel occlusion commonly mechanically injure vascular cells leading to endothelial denudation and smooth muscle cell luminal migration. Due to this dichotomous migratory behavior, a need exists for modulating vascular cell growth and migration in a more targeted manner. Here, we examine the efficacy of utilizing small direct current electric fields to influence vascular cell-specific migration ("galvanotaxis"). We designed, fabricated, and implemented an in vitro chamber for tracking vascular cell migration direction, distance, and displacement under galvanotactic influence of varying magnitude. Our results indicate that vascular ECs and SMCs have differing responses to galvanotaxis; ECs exhibit a positive correlation of anodal migration while SMCs exhibit minimal change in directional migration in relation to the electric field direction. SMCs exhibit less motility response (i.e. distance traveled in 4 h) compared to ECs, but SMCs show a significantly higher motility at low electric potentials (80 mV/cm). With further investigation and translation, galvanotaxis may be an effective solution for modulation of vascular cell-specific migration, leading to enhanced endothelialization, with coordinate reduced smooth muscle in-migration.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell growth; Cell migration; Electrotaxis; Endothelial cell; Galvanotaxis; Smooth muscle cell; Vascular cell; Wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33347857      PMCID: PMC7906251          DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Cell Res        ISSN: 0014-4827            Impact factor:   3.905


  42 in total

Review 1.  Drug-eluting stent and coronary thrombosis: biological mechanisms and clinical implications.

Authors:  Thomas F Lüscher; Jan Steffel; Franz R Eberli; Michael Joner; Gaku Nakazawa; Felix C Tanner; Renu Virmani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  The evolution of cardiovascular stent materials and surfaces in response to clinical drivers: a review.

Authors:  Barry O'Brien; William Carroll
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents.

Authors:  Matthias Pfisterer; Hans Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Peter T Buser; Peter Rickenbacher; Patrick Hunziker; Christian Mueller; Raban Jeger; Franziska Bader; Stefan Osswald; Christoph Kaiser
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Galvanotropic and galvanotaxic responses of corneal endothelial cells.

Authors:  P C Chang; G I Sulik; H K Soong; W C Parkinson
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Emelia J Benjamin; Salim S Virani; Clifton W Callaway; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Francesca N Delling; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Pamela L Lutsey; Jason S Mackey; David B Matchar; Kunihiro Matsushita; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Martin O'Flaherty; Latha P Palaniappan; Ambarish Pandey; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew D Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Ioannis Iakovou; Thomas Schmidt; Erminio Bonizzoni; Lei Ge; Giuseppe M Sangiorgi; Goran Stankovic; Flavio Airoldi; Alaide Chieffo; Matteo Montorfano; Mauro Carlino; Iassen Michev; Nicola Corvaja; Carlo Briguori; Ulrich Gerckens; Eberhard Grube; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  A role for endogenous electric fields in wound healing.

Authors:  Richard Nuccitelli
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Age-dependent migratory behavior of human endothelial cells revealed by substrate microtopography.

Authors:  Adrià Sales; Catherine Picart; Ralf Kemkemer
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.905

9.  Cellular microenvironment modulates the galvanotaxis of brain tumor initiating cells.

Authors:  Yu-Ja Huang; Gwendolyn Hoffmann; Benjamin Wheeler; Paula Schiapparelli; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Peter Searson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Collective cell migration of smooth muscle and endothelial cells: impact of injury versus non-injury stimuli.

Authors:  Kaitlyn R Ammann; Katrina J DeCook; Phat L Tran; Valerie M Merkle; Pak K Wong; Marvin J Slepian
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.