Literature DB >> 15284235

Structural analysis of DNA interactions with biogenic polyamines and cobalt(III)hexamine studied by Fourier transform infrared and capillary electrophoresis.

Amin Ahmed Ouameur1, Heidar-Ali Tajmir-Riahi.   

Abstract

Biogenic polyamines, such as putrescine, spermidine, and spermine are small organic polycations involved in numerous diverse biological processes. These compounds play an important role in nucleic acid function due to their binding to DNA and RNA. It has been shown that biogenic polyamines cause DNA condensation and aggregation similar to that of inorganic cobalt(III)hexamine cation, which has the ability to induce DNA conformational changes. However, the nature of the polyamine.DNA binding at the molecular level is not clearly established and is the subject of much controversy. In the present study the effects of spermine, spermidine, putrescine, and cobalt(III)hexamine on the solution structure of calf-thymus DNA were investigated using affinity capillary electrophoresis, Fourier transform infrared, and circular dichroism spectroscopic methods. At low polycation concentrations, putrescine binds preferentially through the minor and major grooves of double strand DNA, whereas spermine, spermidine, and cobalt(III)hexamine bind to the major groove. At high polycation concentrations, putrescine interaction with the bases is weak, whereas strong base binding occurred for spermidine in the major and minor grooves of DNA duplex. However, major groove binding is preferred by spermine and cobalt(III)hexamine cations. Electrostatic attractions between polycation and the backbone phosphate group were also observed. No major alterations of B-DNA were observed for biogenic polyamines, whereas cobalt(III)hexamine induced a partial B --> A transition. DNA condensation was also observed for cobalt(III)hexamine cation, whereas organic polyamines induced duplex stabilization. The binding constants calculated for biogenic polyamines are K(Spm) = 2.3 x 10(5) M(-1), K(Spd) = 1.4 x 10(5) M(-1), and K(Put) = 1.02 x 10(5) M(-1). Two binding constants have been found for cobalt(III)hexamine with K(1) = 1.8 x 10(5) M(-1) and K(2) = 9.2 x 10(4) M(-1). The Hill coefficients indicate a positive cooperativity binding for biogenic polyamines and a negative cooperativity for cobalt(III)hexamine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15284235     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M406053200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  52 in total

1.  The C terminus of tubulin, a versatile partner for cationic molecules: binding of Tau, polyamines, and calcium.

Authors:  Julien Lefèvre; Konstantin G Chernov; Vandana Joshi; Stéphanie Delga; Flavio Toma; David Pastré; Patrick A Curmi; Philippe Savarin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Cation charge dependence of the forces driving DNA assembly.

Authors:  Jason DeRouchey; V Adrian Parsegian; Donald C Rau
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Probing tRNA interaction with biogenic polyamines.

Authors:  Amin Ahmed Ouameur; Philippe Bourassa; Heidar-Ali Tajmir-Riahi
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  Correlation effects, image charge effects and finite size in the macro-ion-electrolyte system: a field-theoretic approach.

Authors:  D J Lee
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 1.890

5.  Helical structure determines different susceptibilities of dsDNA, dsRNA, and tsDNA to counterion-induced condensation.

Authors:  Alexei A Kornyshev; Sergey Leikin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Biogenic and synthetic polyamines bind bovine serum albumin.

Authors:  S Dubeau; P Bourassa; T J Thomas; H A Tajmir-Riahi
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 6.988

7.  Pattern preferences of DNA nucleotide motifs by polyamines putrescine2+, spermidine3+ and spermine4.

Authors:  Sergiy Perepelytsya; Jozef Uličný; Aatto Laaksonen; Francesca Mocci
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Ligand-induced DNA condensation: choosing the model.

Authors:  Vladimir B Teif
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Physiological levels of salt and polyamines favor writhe and limit twist in DNA.

Authors:  Qing Shao; Sachin Goyal; Laura Finzi; David Dunlap
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 5.985

10.  Structural analysis of DNA complexation with cationic lipids.

Authors:  Regis Marty; Christophe N N'soukpoé-Kossi; David Charbonneau; Carl Maximilian Weinert; Laurent Kreplak; Heidar-Ali Tajmir-Riahi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.