Literature DB >> 15284188

Implantology and the severely resorbed edentulous mandible.

C Stellingsma1, A Vissink, H J A Meijer, C Kuiper, G M Raghoebar.   

Abstract

Patients with a severely resorbed edentulous mandible often suffer from problems with the lower denture. These problems include: insufficient retention of the lower denture, intolerance to loading by the mucosa, pain, difficulties with eating and speech, loss of soft-tissue support, and altered facial appearance. These problems are a challenge for the prosthodontist and surgeon. Dental implants have been shown to provide a reliable basis for fixed and removable prostheses. This has resulted in a drastic change in the treatment concepts for management of the severely resorbed edentulous mandible. Reconstructive, pre-prosthetic surgery has changed from surgery aimed to provide a sufficient osseous and mucosal support for a conventional denture into surgery aimed to provide a sufficient bone volume enabling implants to be placed at the most optimal positions from a prosthetic point of view. The aim of this paper is to review critically the literature on procedures related to the severely resorbed edentulous mandible and dental implant treatment. The study includes the transmandibular implant, (short) endosseous implants, and reconstructive procedures such as distraction osteogenesis, augmentation of the mandibular ridge with autogenous bone, and bone substitutes followed by the placement of implants. The number of patients participating in a study, the follow-up period, the design of the study, the degree of mandibular resorption, and the survival rate of the dental implants all are considered evaluation parameters. Although numerous studies have described the outcome results of dental implants in the edentulous mandible, there have been few prospective studies designed as randomized clinical trials that compare different treatment modalities to restore the severely resorbed mandible. Therefore, it is not yet possible to select an evidence-based treatment modality. Future research has to be focused on long-term, detailed follow-up clinical trials before scientifically based decisions in treating these patients can be made. This will contribute to a higher level of care in this field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15284188     DOI: 10.1177/154411130401500406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med        ISSN: 1045-4411


  17 in total

Review 1.  Implants in bone: part I. A current overview about tissue response, surface modifications and future perspectives.

Authors:  Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Tobias Moest; Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-24

2.  Implant-supported rehabilitation after treatment of atrophic mandibular fractures: report of two cases.

Authors:  Leandro Benetti de Oliveira; Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli; Mario Francisco Real Gabrielli; Valfrido Antonio Pereira Pereira-Filho
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-05-22

3.  Repair of a fractured implant overdenture gold bar: A clinical and laboratory technique report.

Authors:  Fahim Vohra; Amani Al Fawaz
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-07

4.  Application of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite ceramic block for onlay block bone grafting in implant treatment: A case report.

Authors:  Kouji Ohta; Misato Tada; Yoshiaki Ninomiya; Hiroki Kato; Fumi Ishida; Hitoshi Abekura; Kazuhiro Tsuga; Masaaki Takechi
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Evolving surgical prosthetic rehabilitation protocol for success of dental implant placed in distracted alveolar ridge.

Authors:  S K Rath; Ramen Sinha; Derek D'Souza
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-09-14

6.  Mandibular fractures associated with endosteal implants.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Antônio Luís Neto Custódio
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-12

7.  Effect of chronic kidney disease on the healing of titanium implants.

Authors:  Huawei Zou; Xuefeng Zhao; Ningyuan Sun; Shiwen Zhang; Tadatoshi Sato; Haiyang Yu; Qianming Chen; Hans-Peter Weber; Michel Dard; Quan Yuan; Beate Lanske
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Implants in the severely resorbed mandibles: whether or not to augment? What is the clinician's preference?

Authors:  Frits B T Perdijk; Gert J Meijer; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Ron Koole
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-08-19

9.  Use of a Simple Appliance to Prevent Mucosal Irritation by the Distractor Rod during Vertical Distraction: Case Report.

Authors:  Mehtap Muglali; Nukhet Celebi; Samet Inal; Burak Bekcioglu; Burcu Bas
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-07

10.  Vitamin D supplementation enhances the fixation of titanium implants in chronic kidney disease mice.

Authors:  Weiqing Liu; Shiwen Zhang; Dan Zhao; Huawei Zou; Ningyuan Sun; Xing Liang; Michel Dard; Beate Lanske; Quan Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.