Literature DB >> 15281968

Accuracy of the Tonosafe disposable tonometer head compared to the Goldmann tonometer alone.

Peter Kim1, Somsak Lertsumitkul, Meaghan Clark, Leeanne Gardner, Peter Macken.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of the Tonosafe disposable prism tonometer head via a randomised controlled prospective trial.
METHODS: The intraocular pressure (IOP) of 69 patients (31 men, 38 women) involving 137 eyes was measured using both the Tonosafe disposable and the Goldmann tono-meter head. The average age of patients was 66.5 years (range 23-93 years). The two examiners (PM and SL) who performed tonometry were masked while a separate observer read the IOP measurements. The order was randomised between Tonosafe and Goldmann devices. The minimum interval between the two measurements was 15 min. Patients with corneal and external diseases were excluded from the study.
RESULTS: The mean IOP using the Goldmann tonometer head was 17.44 +/- 4.97 mmHg. The mean IOP using the Tonosafe disposable head was 17.58 +/- 5.03 mmHg. The mean difference was 0.14 +/- 1.73 mmHg (95% CI -0.44, 0.16, P= 0.36). Subgroup analysis on eyes with IOP > 21 mmHg showed the Tonosafe disposable head was on average 0.15 +/- 2.40 mmHg higher than the Goldmann tonometer head. There was a high level of correlation between the IOPs obtained with the Goldmann and Tonosafe heads. Pearson's coefficient of correlation was 0.94 (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The Tonosafe disposable prism head was found to be accurate in IOP measurement, even in the higher range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15281968     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00838.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  7 in total

1.  Does the surface property of a disposable applanation tonometer account for its underestimation of intraocular pressure when compared with the Goldmann tonometer?

Authors:  Sarah F Osborne; Rachel Williams; Mark Batterbury; David Wong
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Reliability of tonosafe disposable tonometer prisms: clinical implications from the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System Quality Assurance Study.

Authors:  V Thomas; M K Daly; T Cakiner-Egilmez; E Baker
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Changes to ophthalmic clinical care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Authors:  Miel Sundararajan; Julie M Schallhorn; Thuy Doan; Gerami D Seitzman
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Disposable versus non-disposable tonometer prisms: a UK national survey.

Authors:  Kirti M Jasani; Christine Putri; Amy Pearl; Nayeem Sattar; Karl Mercieca; George Spaeth; Archana Bhan-Bhargava
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-09

5.  Ophthalmic statistics note 13: method agreement studies in ophthalmology-please don't carry on correlating….

Authors:  Catey Bunce; Irene M Stratton; Andrew Elders; Gabriela Czanner; Caroline Doré; Nick Freemantle
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  How should we measure intraocular pressure in the era of coronavirus disease 2019? Balancing infectious risk, cleaning requirements, and accuracy.

Authors:  Christine A Petersen; Andrew Chen; Philip P Chen
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 7.  Guidelines and Recommendations for Tonometry Use during the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Enmar M Almazyad; Sally Ameen; Mohammad A Khan; Rizwan Malik
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.