H Maul1, W L Maner, G Olson, G R Saade, R E Garfield. 1. Division of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study was conducted to investigate whether the strength of uterine contractions monitored invasively by intrauterine pressure catheter could be determined from transabdominal electromyography (EMG) and to estimate whether EMG is a better predictor of true labor compared to tocodynamometry (TOCO). STUDY DESIGN: Uterine EMG was recorded from the abdominal surface in laboring patients simultaneously monitored with an intrauterine pressure catheter (n = 13) or TOCO (n = 24). Three to five contractions per patient and corresponding electrical bursts were randomly selected and analyzed (integral of intrauterine pressure; integral, frequency, amplitude of contraction curve on TOCO; burst energy for EMG). The Mann-Whitney test, Spearman correlation and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis were used as appropriate (significance was assumed at a value of p < 0.05). RESULTS: EMG correlated strongly with intrauterine pressure (r = 0.764; p = 0.002). EMG burst energy levels were significantly higher in patients who delivered within 48 h compared to those who delivered later (median [25%/75%]: 96,640 [26,520-322,240] vs. 2960 [1560-10,240]; p < 0.001), whereas none of the TOCO parameters were different. In addition, burst energy levels were highly predictive of delivery within 48 h (AUC = 0.9531; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: EMG measurements correlated strongly with the strength of contractions and therefore may be a valuable alternative to invasive measurement of intrauterine pressure. Unlike TOCO, transabdominal uterine EMG can be used reliably to predict labor and delivery.
OBJECTIVE: The study was conducted to investigate whether the strength of uterine contractions monitored invasively by intrauterine pressure catheter could be determined from transabdominal electromyography (EMG) and to estimate whether EMG is a better predictor of true labor compared to tocodynamometry (TOCO). STUDY DESIGN: Uterine EMG was recorded from the abdominal surface in laboring patients simultaneously monitored with an intrauterine pressure catheter (n = 13) or TOCO (n = 24). Three to five contractions per patient and corresponding electrical bursts were randomly selected and analyzed (integral of intrauterine pressure; integral, frequency, amplitude of contraction curve on TOCO; burst energy for EMG). The Mann-Whitney test, Spearman correlation and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis were used as appropriate (significance was assumed at a value of p < 0.05). RESULTS: EMG correlated strongly with intrauterine pressure (r = 0.764; p = 0.002). EMG burst energy levels were significantly higher in patients who delivered within 48 h compared to those who delivered later (median [25%/75%]: 96,640 [26,520-322,240] vs. 2960 [1560-10,240]; p < 0.001), whereas none of the TOCO parameters were different. In addition, burst energy levels were highly predictive of delivery within 48 h (AUC = 0.9531; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: EMG measurements correlated strongly with the strength of contractions and therefore may be a valuable alternative to invasive measurement of intrauterine pressure. Unlike TOCO, transabdominal uterine EMG can be used reliably to predict labor and delivery.
Authors: Miha Lucovnik; William L Maner; Linda R Chambliss; Richard Blumrick; James Balducci; Ziva Novak-Antolic; Robert E Garfield Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Miha Lucovnik; Ruben J Kuon; Linda R Chambliss; William L Maner; Shao-Qing Shi; Leili Shi; James Balducci; Robert E Garfield Journal: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Date: 2010-12-07 Impact factor: 3.636