Literature DB >> 15279802

Chromosome damage and progression into and through mitosis in vertebrates.

Ciaran Morrison1, Conly L Rieder.   

Abstract

How cells behave as they divide in the presence of chromosome (DNA) damage is only just beginning to be explored. It appears to depend on the cell type and organism, the stage of development, how extensive the damage is and when it occurs. The existing data support the conclusion that vertebrate somatic cells lack a conventional DNA damage checkpoint during mitosis, and that when damaged DNA does prolong mitosis it is mediated by the spindle assembly checkpoint. As a rule, in the presence of DNA damage cells ultimately undergo an aberrant mitosis and enter the ensuing G1. They then either die, via apoptosis or mitotic catastrophe, or survive with an altered genome. To avoid these outcomes, cells with DNA damage are normally prevented from entering mitosis by a number of G2 checkpoint control pathways.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15279802     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  13 in total

1.  Molecular and cellular pathways associated with chromosome 1p deletions during colon carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Claire M Payne; Cheray Crowley-Skillicorn; Carol Bernstein; Hana Holubec; Harris Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-03

2.  Prolonged cell cycle response of HeLa cells to low-level alkylation exposure.

Authors:  Allen G Schroering; Anbarasi Kothandapani; Steve M Patrick; Saravanan Kaliyaperumal; Vishal P Sharma; Kandace J Williams
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  A positive feedback loop between the p53 and Lats2 tumor suppressors prevents tetraploidization.

Authors:  Yael Aylon; Dan Michael; Ayelet Shmueli; Norikazu Yabuta; Hiroshi Nojima; Moshe Oren
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  Sharpening the ends for repair: mechanisms and regulation of DNA resection.

Authors:  Sharad C Paudyal; Zhongsheng You
Journal:  Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai)       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.848

5.  Chronic myelogenous leukemia stem and progenitor cells demonstrate chromosomal instability related to repeated breakage-fusion-bridge cycles mediated by increased nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Sujata Chakraborty; Jeremy M Stark; Can-Lan Sun; Hardik Modi; WenYong Chen; Timothy R O'Connor; Stephen J Forman; Smita Bhatia; Ravi Bhatia
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  An ATM- and ATR-dependent checkpoint inactivates spindle assembly by targeting CEP63.

Authors:  Eloise Smith; Donniphat Dejsuphong; Alessia Balestrini; Martin Hampel; Christof Lenz; Shunichi Takeda; Alessandro Vindigni; Vincenzo Costanzo
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  DNA damage-induced cell death is enhanced by progression through mitosis.

Authors:  Hanne Varmark; Cynthia A Sparks; Joshua J Nordberg; Birgit S Koppetsch; William E Theurkauf
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Cdk1 uncouples CtIP-dependent resection and Rad51 filament formation during M-phase double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Shaun E Peterson; Yinyin Li; Brian T Chait; Max E Gottesman; Richard Baer; Jean Gautier
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Responding to chromosomal breakage during M-phase: insights from a cell-free system.

Authors:  Eloise Smith; Vincenzo Costanzo
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.130

10.  Epigenetic effect of testosterone in the behavior of C. elegans. A clue to explain androgen-dependent autistic traits?

Authors:  M Mar Gámez-Del-Estal; Israel Contreras; Rocío Prieto-Pérez; Manuel Ruiz-Rubio
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 5.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.