Literature DB >> 15279513

A role for CS-US contingency in Pavlovian conditioning.

Robin A Murphy1, A G Baker.   

Abstract

Two experiments evaluated the role of conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US) contingency in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning in rats. In both experiments, some groups received a positively contingent CS signaling an increased likelihood of the US relative to the absence of the CS. These groups were compared with control treatments in which the likelihood of the US was the same in the presence and absence of the CS. A trial marker served as a trial context. Experiment 1 found contingency sensitivity. There was a reciprocal relationship between responding to the CS and the trial marker. Experiment 2 showed that this result was not stimulus or response specific. These results are consistent with associative explanations and the idea that rats are sensitive to CS-US contingency. (c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15279513     DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.3.229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  10 in total

1.  A test of Rescorla and Wagner's (1972) prediction of nonlinear effects in contingency learning.

Authors:  Joaquín Morís; Susana Carnero; Ignacio Loy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Pseudocontingencies derived from categorically organized memory representations.

Authors:  Tobias Vogel; Peter Freytag; Florian Kutzner; Klaus Fiedler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

3.  Neurogenesis, learning and associative strength.

Authors:  Jaylyn Waddell; Tracey J Shors
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Western-style diet impairs stimulus control by food deprivation state cues: Implications for obesogenic environments.

Authors:  Camille H Sample; Ashley A Martin; Sabrina Jones; Sara L Hargrave; Terry L Davidson
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Benefiting from trial spacing without the cost of prolonged training: Frequency, not duration, of trials with absent stimuli enhances perceived contingency.

Authors:  Santiago Castiello; Ralph R Miller; James E Witnauer; Doriann M Alcaide; Ethan Fung; Riddhi J Pitliya; Dyedra K C Morrissey; Robin A Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-01-06

6.  Acquired appetitive responding to intravenous nicotine reflects a Pavlovian conditioned association.

Authors:  Jennifer E Murray; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  A comparative approach to cue competition with one and two strong predictors.

Authors:  Irina Baetu; A G Baker; Christine Darredeau; Robin A Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: There is a free lunch!

Authors:  Robin A Murphy; James E Witnauer; Santiago Castiello; Anna Tsvetkov; Audrey Li; Doriann M Alcaide; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-09-27

9.  Outcome probability modulates anticipatory behavior to signals that are equally reliable.

Authors:  Helena Matute; Sara Steegen; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Adapt Behav       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.942

10.  Delay of reinforcement versus rate of reinforcement in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Joseph M Austen; David J Sanderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.478

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.